T
treez
Guest
Hello,
Do you think the designer of our 3kw, offline battery charger has deliberately avoided full Power factor correction?
We have a 3kW EV charger which keeps stopping working so we took it apart.
Spec is:-
Vout = 250-420VDC
Vin = 85-265vac
The datasheet says PFC >0.99
Its two boost PFC stages operating alternately (each 10ms on/off) followed by a 100khz LLC resonant converter.
I noticed a PFC output ripple voltage of just 20V pk-to-pk (obviously at 100hz) , in spite of the output capacitance of the PFC stage being only 810uF.
This simply isn’t possible with a proper PFC of >0.99 at 3kw output.
I scoped the drain of one of the boost PFC FETs, and you could clearly see that it wasn’t actually switching continuously over the 10ms half sine “hump”. There were wide intervals (well above the mains zero crossing), where it had completely stopped switching altogether.
The two PFC stages are controlled by a microcontroller.
The equation for output ripple voltage (pk-to-pk) of a PFC stage is…
P(out)/ [2.pi.f(line).Co.Vo]
By this, the ripple voltage would be 29.5V, but we saw only 20V.
Therefore, do you believe that they have deliberately “cheated” on the PFC regulation? After all, EN61000-3-2 has no requirement for PFC for equipments above 1kW. Maybe they thought they’d “cheat” on the PFC just so they could use less output capacitance on the “PFC” stage.?
Do you think the designer of our 3kw, offline battery charger has deliberately avoided full Power factor correction?
We have a 3kW EV charger which keeps stopping working so we took it apart.
Spec is:-
Vout = 250-420VDC
Vin = 85-265vac
The datasheet says PFC >0.99
Its two boost PFC stages operating alternately (each 10ms on/off) followed by a 100khz LLC resonant converter.
I noticed a PFC output ripple voltage of just 20V pk-to-pk (obviously at 100hz) , in spite of the output capacitance of the PFC stage being only 810uF.
This simply isn’t possible with a proper PFC of >0.99 at 3kw output.
I scoped the drain of one of the boost PFC FETs, and you could clearly see that it wasn’t actually switching continuously over the 10ms half sine “hump”. There were wide intervals (well above the mains zero crossing), where it had completely stopped switching altogether.
The two PFC stages are controlled by a microcontroller.
The equation for output ripple voltage (pk-to-pk) of a PFC stage is…
P(out)/ [2.pi.f(line).Co.Vo]
By this, the ripple voltage would be 29.5V, but we saw only 20V.
Therefore, do you believe that they have deliberately “cheated” on the PFC regulation? After all, EN61000-3-2 has no requirement for PFC for equipments above 1kW. Maybe they thought they’d “cheat” on the PFC just so they could use less output capacitance on the “PFC” stage.?