T
Post #17 of the referenced thread has this: "Yes the bus cable is 7 strands of 1mm diam copper in a sheath." You don't say whether the individual strands are insulated; are they?Post #15 of this...
..suggests that Litz wire is best done with multiple enamelled strands, and isn't so good with just multi-stranded , non-insulated copper wire.
What are your thoughts?
I'd rather say, according to a simplistic concept of proximity effect. Typically there's more than one turn in a winding and you need to consider all field contributions. If you look at a full winding layer, mainly the end turns show an increase of inner wire AC resistance. Average effect on the winding is smaller.according to our discussion, that
most of the inner strands wouldnt even conduct
Actually (#24) it is not my opinion; I just quoted from (#18).I'd rather say, according to a simplistic concept of proximity effect. Typically there's more than one turn in a winding and you need to consider all field contributions. If you look at a full winding layer, mainly the end turns show an increase of inner wire AC resistance. Average effect on the winding is smaller.
Similarly, measuring the AC resistance of an isolated litz wire isn't necessarily representative for the winding behaviour.
Excellent simulations but Litz wires shall be most effective when the diameter of the individual wires is of the order of the skin depth (for copper at 50 kHz the skin depth is 0.29mm) and the equivalent solid conductor has diameter many times the skin depth.In case of "type 1" concentric stranded wires like the bus cable presented in post #13, there's effectively no difference in AC resistance between isolated and non-isolated wires if we look a single straight conductor, and neither to a solid wire of same cross section as the below shown AC magnetic simulation shows. I'm simulating a 7x1.2 mm respectively 1x3.2 mm conductor at 50 kHz, AC resistance is per m.
Just clarifying: these simulations are only meant to compare solid wire vs stranded wire (not insulation), not actual litz wire of any type, right? Because even simple type I litz wire with that cross section would show a significant improvement over non-litz wire.In case of "type 1" concentric stranded wires like the bus cable presented in post #13, there's effectively no difference in AC resistance between isolated and non-isolated wires if we look a single straight conductor, and neither to a solid wire of same cross section as the below shown AC magnetic simulation shows. I'm simulating a 7x1.2 mm respectively 1x3.2 mm conductor at 50 kHz, AC resistance is per m.
Thanks for reviewing the post. In the simulation, I'm also comparing with 7-wire "type 1" litz wire. It's the second picture showing isolated wires.Just clarifying: these simulations are only meant to compare solid wire vs stranded wire (not insulation), not actual litz wire of any type, right? Because even simple type I litz wire with that cross section would show a significant improvement over non-litz wire.
The basic premise of litz wire is that each conductor carries equal current. But it's pretty clear in your sim that the center wire carries much less than the others. Try forcing each conductor to have equal current, and the resistance should decrease.Thanks for reviewing the post. In the simulation, I'm also comparing with 7-wire "type 1" litz wire. It's the second picture showing isolated wires.
The result is surprizing at first sight, at least it was for me. But, as mentioned, the setup is not representative for a practical wiring. The trick is the strictly rotational symmetric arrangement, which would be still maintained if you twist the outer wires around the center. But the symmetry is broken if you put the strand in a winding.
This is only true when the strands are held close together so that proximity effect is large. If the situation allows the strands to be spaced apart, there is a reduction of AC resistance compared to a solid conductor, for example: https://studyelectrical.com/2019/01/bundled-conductors.htmlparalleled strands, even if insulated, behave the same as solid, this has been shown many times, it is only the periodic edge to centre weave of litz that forces current to flow in all parallel strands ....
What are you not convinced of? Do you not believe that if several strands are separated from one another sufficiently that the proximity effect will be reduced?.. and since we are talking, in the main, about transformers ....
[ p.s. that link is pretty far from convincing ]
Perhaps this article will be more to your liking. See: https://www.electrical4u.com/advantages-of-bundled-conductorsThat link is concerned with 50/60Hz - where the skin depth is 9cm, it is more about lowering L and increasing C for a transmission line - if you care to read it thoroughly.
Do you dispute the results reported by Sullivan: https://engineering.dartmouth.edu/inductor/papers/stranded.pdfWow, lots of misconceptions to correct....
1. Stranded wire is not a poor-man's litz wire, not even close. Anything claiming otherwise is doing something wrong, or maybe is characterizing things at an inappropriate frequency.
Next is the AC resistance of the stranded wire:
In post #15 you said: "Just like a thin sheet; for the same cross section, the foil conductor has lower AC resistance." What did you mean by the term "AC resistance"?I have not heard about AC resistance before; do you mean the real part of the complex impedance?
Of course it changes; although it doesn't change much if the geometry of the wire doesn't change. Since the real part (AC resistance) changes, the impedance magnitude must change unless the imaginary part (reactance) just happens to change in the opposite direction so as to perfectly compensate for the change in the real part. Look at the third image in post #36. The two curves for the impedance magnitude (green) are not perfectly superimposed at the high frequency end of the green curves because the impedance magnitudes are slightly different. At the left end of the image the start of the 4 curves are perfectly superimposed (within a pixel).It is however important to note that the complex impedance (magnitude) does not change whether the cable is solid or stranded. This agrees with expectations and shows that the experiment has been performed successfully.
at 1 MHz, the real part of the impedance (resp for dissip) is approx 3 times less; at that freq even 30 AWG is too thick!
Although the imag part of the imped does not contrib to dissip, it reduces the current and causes inefficiency.
Of course it has a slight twist. In post #36 I said "it has a very show twist and was not constructed in such a way as to cause each strand to spend equal time in the inside of the bundle and in the outside." I heated the insulation as I stripped the wire to avoid the undoing of the twist so I could get an idea of the amount of twist. See this image; you can see the slight twist where the strands exit the insulation:Actually the stranded wire has a slight twist introduced at manufacture to help it stay together during the coating process ( when one strips the ends one tends to undo any residual twist ) - the grouped individual strands also have more total periphery - i.e. skin - than solid, this accounts for the differences.
What or who are responding to here?What you are saying is - " a strand of wire has inductance "
All copper wire has "skin effect" the tendency for the current to flow in the skin as the freq goes up - thus less area is used to carry current - thus the AC resistance is higher - all due to the way the mag fields act on the current at higher freqs, for 50Hz, it is 9cm ( approx ) - thus for a wire 30cm in dia the current density will drop to 37% at a depth of 9cm ( approx ) and proportionally smaller for higher freqs .....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?