Mentor IC-Flow & Cadence IC5033

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ansunamu

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Oct 19, 2001
Messages
115
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Activity points
845
mentor ic flow

which one is better ?
 

cadence ic5033

i like ic-st@tion, but i think the users of cds are more than mgc's.
 

mentor ic flow manual

I used the DA-IC and IC-Station but i heard the Cadence IC5033 is very powerful .
 

ic5033

I think the Cadence IC5033 is better than IC FLOW.
 

buying cadence ic5033

Both of them is good and powerful. It depends on my familiar with which one.
 

hach cadence ic5033

IC is better esp. for RF design. Many companies use it.
 

cadence ic5033+pdf

I think Cadence IC is better.
and with the help of RFDE, it can extend to the design of RFIC.
 

icflow mentor

I think IC is better,there are many third parth tools support it
 

cadence ic5033

/I/C/5/0/3/3/ is supported by more Foundries.
 

icflow

For schematic : Cadence
For Analog simulation : Hspice = Eldo = Spectre(But expensive !!!)
For Digital : NCV = ModelSim
For layout : Cadence (analog and digital)
For DRC/LVS : Calibre

Cadence has a better framework, and Mentor better tools.
So ... go for a mixed environnement, combining Synopsys as well !!!
 

mentor ic flow rat

okguy said:
For layout : Cadence (analog and digital)

agree all of you.

someone told me magma. how about it?
 

ic flow+mentor

Cadence IC5033 is very powerful I think so
 

ic flow mentor

I use Mentor I think it is very powerful. But I have seen that the foundries give priority to Cadence about creating design kits and models for simulation.
 

lvs + mentor ic

using cadence editing layout
and using calibre for DRC and LVS
 

ic flow features mentor


agree .
 

cadence analog flow tools

I ever used ic st@tion, quite easy to use, but IC5o are more powerful, and main chips that are successful are use the c@dence tools. So ic-st@tion although very cheap, still lack of evidence to work without serious consequences.

for lvs and drc, c@libre are very good tools, high speed, friendly interface, easy to debug, and again cheap. Again c@dence has a more powerful tool @ssura, which can do more than lvs and drc.

and for modelsim, it is just an simulation, designer will always use what they are used to.
 

compare digital simulators mentor cadence

I think it depends on your choice of tools chain. If you want to 'draw' layout, I/C/-/F/l/o/w maybe better. If you want to use P&R tools, however, I/C/5/0/3/3 is better.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…