canarybird33
Member level 1
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2013
- Messages
- 41
- Helped
- 2
- Reputation
- 4
- Reaction score
- 2
- Trophy points
- 1,288
- Location
- Mashhad, Iran, Iran
- Activity points
- 1,591
Hi every body
I want design a circuit to measure load current(LOW COST and reliable)
I chose the blow circuit but it doesn't work
(changing the load current doesn't cause voltage variation in a range)
How can I correct this circuit.
load current variation is 3mA to 300 mA and I want to convert it to 0V to 5 ( and the use the ADC of micro-controller)
I think there is just a small typo in the circuit. If you assume that the point marked R1(1) is actually a positive power supply, then everything makes sense. That's how I interpreted it. Then the negative feedback comes in on the (+) input, but it is still negative feedback because of the inversion provided by Q1. As I see it, the only real problems with the circuit (aside from this typo) is the possible common mode violation and the fact that the scaling is such that 300ma. through the load would only produce 1.2 volts, not 5 volts as the OP was wanting. Changing the 2K resistor to 8333 ohms would fix the scaling problem.Your circuit cannot operate as shown. Besides the 741 problem, there's no negative feedback to the op amp so it's running open-loop and there is no power to the collector of Q1..
Tunelabguy said:Changing the 2K resistor to 8333 ohms would fix the scaling problem.
crutschow said:There are many available rail-rail op amps that should work in the circuit besides the one shown.
Okay, I understand the circuit now. Some of the resistors are way too high in value. Try changing R1 to 4.75Ω and R3 to 2kΩ leaving R2 at 0.2Ω. Below is my simulation of a similar circuit.How can I calculate the R2 resistor?
what about R1 resistor?can I change that?
I designed new circuit(main supply is 24v . Being more sensitive in lower current(4 to 50 mA) is significant to me)
When I increased R3, the out put voltage gets more sensitive to the lower current.I got what I want but let me know what is happening in the circuit?what is the role of Q1?(It makes the feedback negative-what else?)
.....................
I agree that 0.2Ω is probably too low for R2 unless you want to use a low-offset op amp (incidentally you need a rail-rail op amp for this circuit so a 741 or similar won't work)..........................The input offset voltage of a 741 op amp over the full temperature range is about 6 mV max.........................
I would allow maybe 10 times as much voltage drop at full load, so a 2.0 Ohm resistor for R2 would give 600 mV drop at full load and ease the input offset voltage specifications on the op amp. If R2 is 2 Ohms, then pick R1 so that a substantially lower current goes through R1. How about leaving R1 = 100 Ohms? If the full load of 300 mA flows through R2, only 6mA will flow through R1 and R3. Then to make the scaling work out, this 6 ma. has to produce 5 volts across R1, so R1 would be 833 Ohms.
Correct. That was a typo on my part. Most of my references to R1 near the end of my post should have been R3.But you want 5V across R3, not R1. The op amp forces the voltage across R1 to equal R2 or 0.6V at 300mA for R2 = 2Ω. Thus for 5V output the resistance ratio of R3/R2 is 5V/0.6V = 8.333. So, for an output R3 value of 2kΩ, R2 would be 240Ω.
That circuit needs a rail-rail op amp.
................... The circuit with the transistor does not have that problem.
Because the LM324 does not have a rail-to-rail common mode input range, you must ensure that the power pin on the LM324 (pin 4) is at least 2 volts higher than any expected input voltage.
..................So you need to power the LM324 with at least +26 volts, and preferably +28 volts. Can you do that?
some things which is not more expensive than 4 or 5 times of LM741What's "cost effective" for you?
Texas Instrument has several rail-rail types for less then $1 US.some things which is not more expensive than 4 or 5 times of LM741
Texas Instrument has several rail-rail types for less then $1 US.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?