T
I don't understand how this should be possible, as long as the standard says there are no limit values for instruments with real power consumption below 75 W. May be I missed a clause?even if the power level is below 75W, its still possible to fail mains harmonic current limits if the post rectifier capacitance is too high.
Which EN 61000-2-3 clause do you refer to?but you still need to be under the limits for mains harmonic current levels
Please process the figure 1 flow chart. How do you manage to end up at class A (table 1) instead of "EN 61000-3-2 not applicable"?
It's O.K. to say I don't exploit the lax regulation for < 75 W devices. But if you just follow EN61000, there are no harmonic limits.I am sure we all agree that if every <75W offline SMPS on earth had 100mF after the rectifier, then the mains supply system would be full of unwanted harmonics....this is why we still have harmonic limits for <75w offline smps.
Did you even notice the title of EN61000-3-2? "Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current <= 16A per phase)"I don't think EN 61000-3-2 talks about Mains harmonic currents.....EN61000-3-2 is purely about power factor.
Current limit pulse into ESR of caps + diodes + copper is a square edged pulse, so of course harmonics can extend to 5 decades of equal spectral density above fundamental and some will amplify with resonance.
No mystery.
The thing is also that it will be harder to pass conducted emissions tests for <75W SMPS's if one uses an enormous dc bus capacitor such that the mains input current is just a train of short "spikes" of high current peaks with duration say less than 1 millisecond every 10ms.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?