Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

"low output impedance" v.s. "rail-to-rail out

Status
Not open for further replies.

orap

Newbie level 1
Newbie level 1
Joined
Mar 15, 2005
Messages
1
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,290
hi there,

Is there any reference materials which addresses the problem between "low output impedance" and "rail-to-rail output range"???

I need to have a rail-to-rail output with low output impedance in a standard CMOS process. It just kills me.

Thanks.

Aaron
 

Re: "low output impedance" v.s. "rail-to-rail

It is just a thought, can we not buffer (unity gain configuration amp) at output of a class AB (rail-rail) stage.
 

Re: "low output impedance" v.s. "rail-to-rail

what's the output impendence do you preferring? a R-R OPAMP plus push-pull MOSFET pair is an option.

mike

-------------------------------------------
www.ezpcb.com
 

Re: "low output impedance" v.s. "rail-to-rail

a 2 stage amp with push-pull output will do
what configuration r u using?
 

push-pull source follower will provide low output impedence as well as r-2-r signaling
 

Re: "low output impedance" v.s. "rail-to-rail

This IEEE paper should help you.
regards,
srivats
 

Attachments

  • cmos_op-amp_203.pdf
    925.3 KB · Views: 143

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top