logic of coupling between two types of antennas

Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

yefj

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
1,391
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
38
Activity points
8,470
Hello , in the attached article there is a contradiction i cant understand.
On one hand they say that on the high frequency patches we have 1.8 Lambda distance array.
What distance did they play width to suppress the grating lobes at 34?
Thanks.


 

Attachments

  • SharedApertureDualBandMicrostripArray.pdf
    471 KB · Views: 115

Sort by date Sort by votes
Hello, in the attached article they have a certain element shown bellow where its zeros is being planned to fit the grating lobes of the array factor.
What is the name of this anntena?
How do we plan the zero location of such antenna?
As shown bellow from the article they used pairs to plan the zeros,how exactly it could be?
Thanks.


 

Attachments

  • SharedApertureDualBandMicrostripArray.pdf
    471 KB · Views: 127
Last edited:

Upvote 0 Downvote
Hello ,In the attached article i got two types of antennas.
one on low frequency and the other in high frequency as shown bellow.
We have two types of antennas together ,one antenna(high frequency) radiates at horisontal polarization and the other(low frequency) with vertical polarization.
In the article they say that mutual coupling is contolled by orthogonal orientation.
I dont understand that ,why the difference in polarization cancelles the effect of low frequency antenna will ruin the S11 of the high frequency antenna?
Its a foreign object ,it will do coupling and create returns.

 

Attachments

  • SharedApertureDualBandMicrostripArray.pdf
    471 KB · Views: 136

Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…