Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Load Sharing in Parallel AC inverters without communication

Status
Not open for further replies.

adnan012

Advanced Member level 1
Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
468
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
4,923
hi,
I want to discus load sharing in parallel connected dc/ac inverters. Which technique is used to achieve load sharing when there is no synchronization bus/ communication between then two inverters. Is it droop method?

regards
 

All inverters must produce AC waveforms exactly in phase with each other. Without synchronization you have disaster because inevitably one inverter outputs positive voltage while another inverter outputs negative.
 
Thanks for reply.
I am trying to understand the functionality of a 2K watt pure sine-wave inverter. The secondary side has dspic33 series microcontroller and few op-amp circuits for sensing current , voltage etc. I can connect the output of two inverters while both inverters are on and they can handle 4k load.
--- Updated ---

There is not interconnecrton between the inverters.
 
Last edited:

Hi,

I see a misunderstanding.
"Synchronisation" in the OP's meaning is the cummunication from one inverter to the other converter to push identical power to the grid.
Example one solar panel system providing 4kW of power with two inverters. How to achieve that each inverter is driving 2kW to the grid and not 1kW + 3kW.

For sure every inverter needs to synchronize to the grid frequency.

I don't know the answer to the OP's initial question.

Klaus
 

Without some signal means of forcing the inverters to have the same phase ( and Vout and current limiting ) paralleling will be a disaster ... - unless one is run in master mode and the second looks at the first's voltage and synchronises to it ...
 

I think that I've seen "stuff" about using the current
along the cycle to keep the inverter output slightly
leading the mains-reference, in grid tied inverters,
so as to always be delivering energy into the
waveform.

But who's in charge when you have two identical
inverters with no master, is a tricky bit.

I see inverter generators with parallel capability
but they want a special expensive cable. What's
so terrible about imposing communication on
the two inverters? You're already running 3 wires
(hot, neutral, ground), right?

Seems like an opportunity for "power line
communications" protocols, to throw sync and
demand messaging.
 

Some inverter makers allow setting one to master and others to slaves ...
 

The question isn't quite clear. You are asking about grid-tied or islanding inverters? In the former case, the inverters can individually synchronize to the grid but there's no option for equal load sharing without a control link between the inverters.

In case of stand-alone inverters, the inverters must be designed with a master-slave synchronization feature, as stated by Easy peasy.
 

The OP hasn't made it clear whether one or both of the inverters is a GTI.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top