ArminVanBuuren
Member level 3
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2014
- Messages
- 66
- Helped
- 0
- Reputation
- 0
- Reaction score
- 0
- Trophy points
- 6
- Activity points
- 582
That's your 3rd time "One last thing", I guess! ;-)
Now I think, the decision is clear.
The 4 18650 accus delivered with the lamp were blue (sic!) packaged cells labelled UltraFire SX 18650 3200mAh 3.7V . My measurement with 700mA discharge current from 4.2 down to 2.5V resulted in about 2800mAh.
Not too bad, at least no fake. The charger actually stops charging at 4.15 .. 4.2V.
Could you please advise the seller from who you bought your light? I would check his items, whether he sells those single batteries / battery packs. Even though it is not 3200 mAh as advertised, 2800 mAh is still a way better than those 66 mAh presented on the video :lol:
The headlamp **broken link removed** (with 2 18650 cells), the torchlight **broken link removed** (with 3 18650 cells), and extra 18650 cells **broken link removed** or **broken link removed** (which delivered - like the blue ones mentioned - 2800mAh @ 700mA load current, and **broken link removed**, which indeed had only a capacity of about 3500mAh.
Yes, and several blue ones with the same imprint.So **broken link removed** is the set that you personally purchased & measured 2800 mAh?
yesConcerning the (reportedly) 5000 mAh (actually 3500 mAh) ... is single cell meant by this?
There are a lot more available, between 3200 and 5000mAh. But you can't always trust the imprint - or may be the higher capacity ones have shorter life expectancy.Or their overall capacity when 2 of them connected? Because I thought that the maximal capacity of a single LiIon 3.7V cell available was Panasonic 3400 mAh / cell...
Yes, and several blue ones with the same imprint.
yes
There are a lot more available, between 3200 and 5000mAh. But you can't always trust the imprint - or may be the higher capacity ones have shorter life expectancy.
What would you personally recommend? Do you think 5x more expensive Panasonic are worth the price? Or **broken link removed** (eg bought 2x) would be a better idea?
There are probably fake Panasonic batteries also sold on e-bay. Buy directly from Panasonic or from a certified dealer.
Cheap no-name-brand stuff is usually junk.
The link I posted showed fake Ultra Fire batteries. I do not buy cheap junk from e-bay so I do not know how many products are fakes.I intend to take ....., as the user "erikl" measured them & reports capacity of 2800 mAh, which is pretty decent. Do you think they can be different to those sent to him?
Firstly step down from 8 to 3.5V will be more efficient than 4 to 3.5 with lower conduction losses.
Second, the 3 mode position is usually flash, Dim and bright, done by PWM on the driver to the LED.
Thirdly, you will never know how bad they are until you test a decent quantity over the lifetime of cells. Keep in mind when you put cells in series, when one fails they both fail, so get spare cells. If you value economy over quality, go for the cheap batteries.
But if you value Reliability, Capacity, Lifetime and Meeting specs which comes after lots of R&D and quality control, something that Panasonic excels in, get Panasonic batteries only.
Most cheap batteries are priced this way for a reason, due to internal shorts after so many uses ( less than you expected) from material or process quality escapes.
... I would believe that it is a real Panasonic 3400 mAh battery. Would you trust them?
Seems to be a good one. Still about 3200mAh @ 1A .
Now don't start to split hairs or count beans ;-). Check the table linked to above!And how much at 700 mA?
They aren't lost, they are simply not available when discharging with higher currents.Btw where the 200 mAhs are lost? The driver consumes it?
That's your 3rd time "One last thing", I guess! ;-)
Ok; one more (last) estimation:
A single cool white XM-L-T6 CREE LED on its highest setting (2A) uses a voltage of about 3V (at 100..125°C junction temperature - yes, it will get so hot!), i.e. it uses 6W , resulting in a bike's case surface over temperature of 60K, i.e. 85°C @ 25°C ambient temperature at quiet air condition (no wind). Driver losses not yet implied. Under this condition, the luminous flux will be 692lm * 85% ≈ 590 lm (85% is the light yield at about 100°C LED junction temperature).
A single such CREE LED @ 700mA needs a voltage of ≈2.8V (@ ≈100°C junction temperature), i.e. an input power of 2W. Hence 3 of them need 6W, so we have similar thermal conditions as above, the single LED just getting 2W*2.5 K/W=5°C hotter than its inner case contact (instead of 15°C difference for the above single LED @ 2A condition). Also the outer case will be 10°C colder than in the above condition, 75°C at still air. Much higher life expectancy for the LEDs. Luminous flux (=brightness) for a single LED @ 700mA is 280 lm * 90% ≈ 250 lm, or 750 lm for all 3 of them.
Now I think, the decision is clear.
2A for all 3 of them, i.e. ≈700mA per LED.
Lithium batteries do not work well when cold. They are rated at a cosy +25 degrees C. But the battery heats itself a little when discharging making it work a little better than when cold.
I did not read the entire thread to see what circuit you are using to regulate the current at 2.8A.I rather wanted someone to confirm or deny whether the current may stay 2.8 A for the entire discharge if conditions (low temperature) do not require it to get down to 0.7 A.
Then in summer they will overheat which might cause a fire.Apparently, it would be smartest to pack the batteries in some lots of textile, so that they are not exposed to the low temperature.
LED light bulbs are new so maybe they overheat and will not last long. Many LED flashlights also fail soon. The streetlights and traffic lights in my city are all LEDs and you can see the failed ones.By the way, how come that overheating here is so serious? How does it work at normal house bulbs, based on LED emitting? I saw a CREE bulb that was a way stronger, working on 230 V. And in no wind. How come this one does not overheat much more easily?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?