Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

LDO feedback resistor divider

Status
Not open for further replies.

deep_sea

Advanced Member level 4
Full Member level 1
Joined
Oct 23, 2019
Messages
100
Helped
14
Reputation
28
Reaction score
18
Trophy points
18
Activity points
855
Hi,
I wonder what is the motivation behind taken a ratio of LDO output voltage through a resistive divider and feeding it with a reference? what are the disadvantages of comparing Vout to VREF directly? Is the availability of a particular reference voltage the main reason?
If the LDO output level is more convenient as a common mode voltage for the input of the error amplifier and the reference voltage is not available and will be part of the LDO design, would it be better to design a reference voltage similar to the LDO required output?
 

If you mean within a regulator device, the problem with direct comparison is if you compare the output with the same voltage as you need, it mostly defeats the objective - you need the same accurate and stable voltage (although maybe with less current capability) and that would have to come from another regulator. By dividing the output it is still proportional to the actual voltage and the internal reference can be stabilized from the input voltage.

Brian.
 

    deep_sea

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
There is only really one good low voltage reference and it's going to give you about 1.2V. Most desired supply voltage outputs are something else. The feedback divider is how the user gets to set the value. Fixed feedback, you're stuck.
 

    deep_sea

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Yes, the problem is making a stable and accurate voltage reference for other than certain fixed voltages.
Typically an accurate resistive voltage divider is used to get other than those voltages.
 

    deep_sea

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
There is only really one good low voltage reference and it's going to give you about 1.2V. Most desired supply voltage outputs are something else. The feedback divider is how the user gets to set the value. Fixed feedback, you're stuck.
Thanks for your reply. This means that "most accurate" bandgap reference is the original with 1.2 V output. So it is in most cases better to use as accurate reference as possible and use resistive divider as required by common mode of the amplifier. Right?
--- Updated ---

If you mean within a regulator device, the problem with direct comparison is if you compare the output with the same voltage as you need, it mostly defeats the objective - you need the same accurate and stable voltage (although maybe with less current capability) and that would have to come from another regulator. By dividing the output it is still proportional to the actual voltage and the internal reference can be stabilized from the input voltage.

Brian.
Thanks for your reply. You are right. In most cases LDO required output is slightly less than VDD while the reference is more likely a bit lower than LDO output. For example from 1.8 V supply, it might be required to have LDO output of 1.5 V while the bandgap reference is 1.2 V or less.
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top