thank for the reply. But also some small question to make things more clear. What if i use biasing for certain s parameters, so real value of current through biasing resistor is exact, it is still will be not useful to use S-parameter?
Using S-Parameter models give the results for the device at the current the S-Parameters were measured. Most S-Parameter sets are available for several bias currents.
Also i want to ask this: there is device model schematic in some datasheets. There some capacitors, inductances, etc. with parameters. Is there any hope that using such schematic in free simulator like qucs i can get results that are not too far from reality? I tried to download spice models made for ads, mwo, spice etc. all paid programs and import that data into qucs, but it is not worked. file format is different, and qucs internal conversion utility gives syntax errors. So i want to draw this schematic by myself and do simulation, as i understand spice model and that schematic in datasheet is the same thing, right?
The capabilities of qucs are listed here. -->
http://qucs.sourceforge.net/tech/technical.html
I have not used it much, but for what I did do, the results are the same as when using MWO.
qucs has most of the fast equation models for FET and Bipolar devices, so that you enter the math model parameters.
The hoops one has to jump through in getting proprietary models going in commercial simulators is often similar to the effort to attach a model, with parameters maybe adapted from other formats, to use in qucs. Most simulators try to be incompatible.
You can make subcircuit models from model equivalent circuits, but it will cause a significant slowdown when using Spice-type simulation and time domain transients to simulate. That is why specialist companies like Modelithics sell fast equation type models.
Use S-parameters on the assumption the bias circuits are figured out, and go for the matching etc.
Use a few cycles of signal simulated in Spice option to check for distortion and suchlike if the levels are large enough to threaten non-linearity. I regret I cannot help more on using qucs, because I am still trying it out. For a free thing, it does a surprising amount, and what you are unhappy with, you have the opportunity to modify, or ask the user community to help. The code is open source.