I think before speculating about low voltage amplifiers you need to find out how much current is really available. I'm not sure what is 'behind' the microphone input inside your transceiver but it may be nothing more than a 'pull-up' resistor to provide a weak current source. If it is, you can probably dispense with the amplifier completely and use an electret mic instead, they already have a built in FET amplifier and produce many times more signal level than a dynamic insert.
What is the transceiver? can you show us the schematic at the mic input?
Brian.
I am afraid I can't. It do not have the schematic and no one seems to have this. It is a Greek transceiver produced back in the 80s, the model GCR250 from a small company back then, called Wide Spectrum. This is based on a Racal tactical radio, with selectors and divider to set the frequency (amazingly stable for the time).
By reverse engineering, I found, there is a 2.2k resistor inside the transceiver that provides the power (and probably limits the current, but it might not be only this one to do so) to the microphone circuit. Through this resistor, audio is also passed (bad technique).
The hand microphone has only 2 cables.
The ground is common.
The power/audio connection, is fed through the PTT switch to the circuit, to power it up and to pass the audio to the transceiver.
The initial microphone had an electret, which worked in a bit greater sensitivity, but yet not enough to peak nicely and I had to shout on the mic.
I thought that I could a bit preamplify this, so I tried a simgle BJT preamp but this did not work ok.
Then I found this circuit shown to you, which seems to work, but the gain from the dynamic mic is less than with the electret alone.
I have 2 ideas:
1. Short this R5, to increase gain.
2. Using an electret (with it's resistor) in place of the dynamic capsule and leave the rest of the preamp as it is.
What do you think?