Hi guys,
I noticed that most important LQFP-100 pins of LM3S6918 are also present on LM3S6965 at same position ( JTAG, POWER, XTAL, etc... ).
And also observed that the following circuit uses few amount of them :
https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spmu028b/spmu028b.pdf
In case of burning LM3S6918 is it possible to use LM3S6965 instead in that KIT application ?
The question happens because there are not here local avalability of the original uC, and is intended to test it in agressive enviroment.
I checked it out and didn´t find any restrictions to do that, but would appreciate some confirmation.
+++
I noticed that most important LQFP-100 pins of LM3S6918 are also present on LM3S6965 at same position ( JTAG, POWER, XTAL, etc... ).
And also observed that the following circuit uses few amount of them :
https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spmu028b/spmu028b.pdf
In case of burning LM3S6918 is it possible to use LM3S6965 instead in that KIT application ?
The question happens because there are not here local avalability of the original uC, and is intended to test it in agressive enviroment.
I checked it out and didn´t find any restrictions to do that, but would appreciate some confirmation.
+++