Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Identify dirt/damage in used PCB

Status
Not open for further replies.

GuiRitter

Junior Member level 1
Junior Member level 1
Joined
Oct 19, 2011
Messages
17
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Visit site
Activity points
1,560
Hi everyone.

I like to open compact fluorescent lamps that don't work anymore to scavenge components from the ballast (and many other products). In the last one that I opened, I saw some kind or dirt or damage that doesn't seem to come from any component. Here's what it looks like (4000×3000 version in the attachments):

IMG_1948.png

I did nothing with it after removing it from the lamp, except moving two capacitors to show the area better. The color of the component markers ("Top silk" in Proteus ARES) is like that for the entire board. On the bottom side, almost no sign of dirt/damage, so I didn't bothered with a photo.

Someone have an idea of what it could be? More importantly, is it safe to handle this board and remove its components?

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1948.JPG
    IMG_1948.JPG
    2.9 MB · Views: 148

Could be solid deposits of smoke particles, that came from a bursting component?

- - - Updated - - -

Or a liquid (gel or electrolyte) that came from a bursting component, and then dried?
 

Could be solid deposits of smoke particles, that came from a bursting component?

- - - Updated - - -

Or a liquid (gel or electrolyte) that came from a bursting component, and then dried?

No signs of burst components. It could be from the electrolytic capacitor. It is very lightly dirtied on the bottom.
 

looks like water pooled up on that end. You can see the watermark on the transistor and the green cap in front of it.

Larry G
 

looks like water pooled up on that end. You can see the watermark on the transistor and the green cap in front of it.

Larry G

It could be, but the mark at the green cap that is closer to bottom in the photo is higher (barely appears in the photo).
 

I think the PCB was not cleaned properly to start with. Nothing happens to the tube but the electronics invariably fails after 2 years. This is a design feature.

I too have about 5-6 failed CFL - waiting to be safely disposed off. I shall take a look at their anatomy when I get some free time. Thanks for the idea!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top