Thanks its more a case of improving it than correcting it.If the harmonics are generated in one end of a cable, how can you correct it at the other end?
What happens is that you impact on the flux in the core by switching current in a "harmonic correction coil" which is wound round the transformer core, along with the normal pri and sec coils.I don't think forcing/regulating the current is a good idea.
Thanks, yes but thats a fantastic improvement.....there will be lots of these "super transformers" and they will do a great job....making losses in the overall grid go down significantly.....this is necessary where in the near future there will be an explosion in numbers of connected solar inverters , battery chargers and EV chargers on the grid.....in short, without my invention, the grid will be toast!Your "super_transformer" can only maintain sinusoidal current up to the first branch of the connected grid.
Thanks but this isnt like a GTi....they are just power semiconductor bridges....this is an actual 50Hz iron transformer, with an auxiliary control coil wound round it. The current in that coil is switched by power semiconductors.GTI's already do this but cost more per MW than traditional magnetics.
We already have calcs which show that in the future where the grid is a mish mash of high power EV chargers and solar inverters and wind turbine generators all over the place, all of which switching in/out of the grid like nobodys business....our device deffo makes the grid losses far far less.Do you have any specs for efficiency, voltage rating and Zo for load regulation?
Aren't the active harmonic filters (AHF) supposed to do that?..so my invention will correct the mains current...making it sinusoidal, or "more sinusoidal than it was"
Thanks, yes , but the implementation has been different in the past...this now, is literally a 50Hz 1:1 transformer placed in a mains phase and with aux coil wrapped round it to achieve cancellation....or an actual low voltage grid transformer replaced with the same thing but just having extra coils round it which are actively switched by semiconductors and influence the magnetic field in the core.Active PFC filters, both parallel and series connected (your discussion refers to the latter) have been suggested in literature and practically implemented since decades.
OK how can you justify the cost of adding to every 3 phase and 1 phase transformer or node ? What are the savings?Thanks, yes , but the implementation has been different in the past...this now, is literally a 50Hz 1:1 transformer placed in a mains phase and with aux coil wrapped round it to achieve cancellation....or an actual low voltage grid transformer replaced with the same thing but just having extra coils round it which are actively switched by semiconductors and influence the magnetic field in the core.
The grid use-age is totally different now with all the solar and EV's and battery storage...totally totally different......horrific harmonic disaster will ensue if my invention is not implemented pronto!
Maybe not a ponzi scheme to be exact, could be a basic pump and dump scam. In either case the first step is generally to raise money from feckless investors (including state institutions, why not?).The "news" page shows that they have already raised millions of pounds in investment, from multiple VC agencies, and you say its a ponzi scheme?
It looks like NATO and the National Grid of UK have already weighed in and given backing....ponzi?
Thanks i appreciate you probably dont have time to read the ionate.energy website, but they arent doing a "solid state transformer" as such.solid state transformers have been around a while
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?