The calculator uses ideal components. It does not factor in any parasitic resistance. It assumes 100% efficiency.
My simulation added 1/2 ohm as a reasonable resistance. I found I was unable to get sufficient current flowing in the primary, within a duty cycle that allowed sufficient energy to go to the secondary. That is why I made the step-up ration 1:2, and reduced the Henry value below 100uH.
Seeing the results from the schmidt-walter calculator, I did more experiments with the simulation. As it turns out, a ratio of 1:1 is feasible. In fact this is more or less equivalent to a buckboost converter, with a single inductor.
Your supply specs can be achieved with more than one combination of component values. Your control circuit will adjust the frequency and duty cycle, depending on the supply V.
If you wind your own transformer, it is okay whether you add turns to the secondary for a 1:1, or 1:1.1, or 1:1.2, etc., ratio.