Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

how to resolve lec non equivalent point comparison

Status
Not open for further replies.

narureddyk

Newbie level 6
Newbie level 6
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
14
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,283
Activity points
1,361
After running the lec using conformal i have the following non equivalent points

core_inst/adder_primary_first/resample_inst/regdata1_reg[4] -golden
core_inst_adder_primary_first_resample_inst_regdata1_reg_4_inst/U$1

how to resolve this noneqivalent points
how exactly do i need to write in the lec.do file the renaming rule to eliminate this




thanks
naru
 

Non-equivalence means that they have different fucntionality.
Unmapped means that Conforaml can't find object in Revised design according to rename rules.

If your points non-equivalent, check Revised design correctness.
If they reported (REPORT UNMAPPED POINTS) as unmapped make something like this (from UG):
" Do the following to manually map key points:
1. Click the primary output pin in the Golden design to highlight it.
2. Right-click and choose Set Target Mapping Point from the pop-up menu.
3. Click the primary output pin in the Revised design to highlight it.
4. Right-click and choose Add Mapping Point – Non-invert from the pop-up menu.
"
 

I got the answer to the question posted
Use renaming rule option
"reg[%d]" "reg_@1_inst\/U\$1" -golden with the renaming rule option
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top