D.A.(Tony)Stewart
Advanced Member level 7
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2007
- Messages
- 9,807
- Helped
- 1,854
- Reputation
- 3,709
- Reaction score
- 2,404
- Trophy points
- 1,413
- Location
- Richmond Hill, ON, Canada
- Activity points
- 62,974
The results are **broken link removed**DTV dishes operate at a shorter wavelength so a larger dish may be necessary.
What signal levels does this report for your location
**broken link removed**
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=29 Just enter your zip code and antenna height ( guess) and paste results
- - - Updated - - -
These are very popular here but not same as mine.
**broken link removed**
looks like 7,8,10 are VHF so a Yagi works best for those wavelengths.
21 is in the lower region of UHF
so a Yagi works best for those wavelengths.
VHF gain drops off quickly moving from 1/2 to 1/4 wave dish due to impedance rise
Brian's rule of thumb: to be useful, the dish diameter should be at least 10 times the wavelength of the signal you want to receive.
So for 700MHz the wavelength is 321mm and the dish should be > 3.2m (about 10.5')
For lower frequencies it needs to be bigger. Below about 1000MHz it is easier to use Yagi antennas to get equivalent gain.
The dish in the picture is a combination of dish/LNB for satellite reception and something in the disk on the double arm for VHF/UHF. Its gain on normal TV channels will be very small (it is probably nothing more than a loop) and the dish will have absolutely no effect on reception.
Brian.
So basically the signal gets reduced to 1/4 what it was , and also makes gain 1/4 of the gain because of the signal
unfortunately not, 1/4 wave has the property of impedance inversion so it would become a null if 1/4 wave
rule of thumb is you need 15 elements to get near 15 dB gain which is about the limit for Yagi's. and -about 30" elements wide. extra ones a lot shorter and longer won't help.
You need about 3-8Mbps for Ethernet on KODI possibly less on SD.
Look at it this way: the dish has to be bigger for the same gain as the frequency reduces. Those huge dishes were for 'C' band broadcasts at around 4,000MHz, you want one to work at less than 700MHz! Before even considering it as an option, remember that satellites sending TV to your area are in orbit and the dish points to the sky. For terrestrial signals, you have to point it to the horizon which is even more difficult.So what you are saying i would need one of those c-band dishes, which are the dishes that where used in the 80's?
Look at it this way: the dish has to be bigger for the same gain as the frequency reduces. Those huge dishes were for 'C' band broadcasts at around 4,000MHz, you want one to work at less than 700MHz! Before even considering it as an option, remember that satellites sending TV to your area are in orbit and the dish points to the sky. For terrestrial signals, you have to point it to the horizon which is even more difficult.
I would say that almost all commercial antennas are designed by artists, not engineers. They try to make something that looks technical because people will buy it. The truth is that if they used a short length of wire instead of the fancy metalwork, it would probably work just as well.
For a dish to work properly, the capture area (area inside the circumference of the dish) has to be focussed on one point and the receiving dipole has to be at that point. There is absolutley no advantage to additional directors when the signal is aimed away from them by the dish. What you are seeing in the picture is a dish being used as the reflector in a Yagi configuration. It does exactly the same as the slightly longer element at the back of a conventional 'flat' Yagi except that by being above the center line of the boom, its effect is reduced and the antenna sqints downward toward the ground.
Brian.
...as a minimum size to be of an use. Ideally, it would be twice that diameter or more and at lower frequencies it would have to be much bigger. For the lowest US TV channel (ch2) at 54MHz, the dish would have to be 41m diameter (about 135').You where saying that i would need a dish that would be 10x the size of the wavelength
I would say that almost all commercial antennas are designed by artists, not engineers. They try to make something that looks technical because people will buy it. The truth is that if they used a short length of wire instead of the fancy metalwork, it would probably work just as well..
Which of the channels do you receive?
How long is antenna cable? I think an RF booster amp would help overcome cable losses but not necessary improve SNR of a good TV
Do you have a 300 to 75 ohm adapter?
Provide details of your dish if being used.
7,8,10 are VHF
21 is in the lower region of UHF
LNA 15 db gain https://www.amazon.com/Channel-Mast...8&qid=1470576628&sr=1-7&keywords=tv+amplifier
antenna https://www.amazon.com/Channel-Mast..._SR160,160_&psc=1&refRID=ETVKVBBC28K0BMHEDW61
do you get any signal?
coax loss?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?