Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dazhen said:See the solution attached.
arunmit168 said:dazhen said:See the solution attached.
i think the one u wrote is not right..
d(x^x) = x * x^(x-1) + x^x * log(x)
u applied only the x^n rule... what abt n^x rule? where n is constant.. u have to assume both the rules i mean... assuming x in the base as constant and x in the power as constant... and
to my knowledge, there s no answer for it. there are no integral s that exist for functions that osciallate too much or diverge at very faster rates.. if u could plot the function using matlab or mathematica or maple, then u could see how fast it diverges. i have read this in "fundamentals of calculus" by thomas and finney.
/Am
arunmit168 said:dazhen said:See the solution attached.
i think the one u wrote is not right..
d(x^x) = x * x^(x-1) + x^x * log(x)
u applied only the x^n rule... what abt n^x rule? where n is constant.. u have to assume both the rules i mean... assuming x in the base as constant and x in the power as constant... and
to my knowledge, there s no answer for it. there are no integral s that exist for functions that osciallate too much or diverge at very faster rates.. if u could plot the function using matlab or mathematica or maple, then u could see how fast it diverges. i have read this in "fundamentals of calculus" by thomas and finney.
/Am
mmatica said:"there are no integral s that exist for functions that osciallate too much or diverge
at very faster rates.. if u could plot the function using matlab or mathematica or maple, then u could see how fast it diverges. i have read this in "fundamentals of calculus" by thomas and finney. "
This is not true! x e^(x^2) is growing more quickly than x^x and it has an elementary antiderivative!
M.