Ibtissam Aziz
Newbie level 4
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2015
- Messages
- 6
- Helped
- 0
- Reputation
- 0
- Reaction score
- 0
- Trophy points
- 1
- Activity points
- 61
Yes - but only in the vicinity of the pole frequency. In the other frequency regions the slope always approaches n*20 dB/dec.You can make filters that have sharper cutoffs .....
Why would you want to?........................ I was wondering how to design filters that aren't -20/-40..etc dB/dec.
............................
Yes - but only in the vicinity of the pole frequency. In the other frequency regions the slope always approaches n*20 dB/dec.
But that's the question. :???:In case you want to customize a rolloff curve so it is shallower....
........................
Why would you want to?
That is only of interest in an academic sense.
I see no reason to do it in practice.
But that's the question. :???:
Why, in practice would you want to have a shallower rolloff...?
A pink noise filter isn't a simple low-pass. The 10 dB/decade frequency response can be only implemented as a combination of poles and zeros, e.g. as a RC ladder circuit. See e.g. **broken link removed**
The design method is an approximation.
[/COLOR]
R1
___
in --+|___|-----+ out
| .-.
| |
| |R2
'-'
|
--- C1
---
|
--------+-----+
The transfer function is a pole-zero-pair, in this case acting as lag-lead element. It can't be mapped to a pure low-pass (pole).I found function transfert is (1+jR2C1w)/(1+j(R1C1+R2C2)w)
And I can't make the link between 1st order low pass form (1/(1+jTow))
So, if I cascade several of these specific filters and place correctly poles and zeros I should be able to get what I want -10dB/dec for example.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?