DimaKilani
Member level 1
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2014
- Messages
- 39
- Helped
- 0
- Reputation
- 0
- Reaction score
- 0
- Trophy points
- 1,286
- Activity points
- 1,648
Judging by your circuit, oh, wait a minute, I have no idea what your circuit looks like....
View attachment 101791
Here is my circuit. I just want to know the key idea of connecting both nmos transistor, pmos transistor and a combinational nmaos and pmos. No matter what the circuit is, there is a basic way that both transistor are connected in a right method.
Most likely an erroneous belief. A certain gate leakage of your 65 nm transistors can be expected by nature of the technology.am trying to connect them in a switched capacitor circuit. I figure out that I have a gate leakage and I think that this gate leakge is due to the incorrect connection between the nmos and pmos ... Any idea ?
Most likely an erroneous belief. A certain gate leakage of your 65 nm transistors can be expected by nature of the technology.
I agree with barry. Transistors will be connected according to the intended functionality of your circuit. If you have no clue, consult a text book or scientific papers.
I'm under the impression that you have been assigned a to an IC design project without sufficient information about the used technology or examples to learn the design methods.
Either PMOS or NMOS switches can be used for any of the switches you have shown. But some choices are easier than others to implement. For switches that go to ground, it is easier to use an NMOS switch, since it is easy to drive the gate of an NMOS low-side switch with a ground-referenced logic signal. Similarly, it is easier to use a PMOS switch when switching to +VBat, because it is easy to drive the gate of a PMOS switch from a logic signal that is referenced to +VBat. If the phase1/phase2 logic signal is made to range from +VBat to ground, it can serve in both of these places. But that only covers three of the eight switches in your circuit. The difficulty comes in controlling the five switches that go to neither ground nor +VBat. For such switches, neither end of the switch is ground or +VBat all the time, so the drive signal cannot be referenced to either ground or +VBat.fine. what are these ways ? and how to choose the best way ?
Any reasoning why the gate voltage should not be inversed (with respect to the active gate level)?If you look at various designs for H-bridge switches, you will see that they sometimes use all four NMOS switches. In that case, the lower two switches are easy to switch. But the higher two switches require level-shifting gate drive. I think you would have to do something like that to control floating switches. You have to level-shift the gate control signal to any switch that is not connected to ground or +VBat. In the case of NMOS switches, you have to ensure that the gate is never negative with respect to the source. In the case of PMOS switches, you have to ensure that the gate is never positive with respect to the source.
Perhaps I am incorrectly extrapolating from power electronics circuits with discrete MOSFETs. In those circuits the gate drive is always referenced to the source (or drain, if they are at the same potential). So maybe that kind of analysis does not apply to ICs.Any reasoning why the gate voltage should not be inversed (with respect to the active gate level)?
If you review common CMOS digital or analog designs, you'll notice that the gates are usally driven by buffers swinging over the full supply range (provided all involved levels are within the voltage ratings of the respective technology). In a CMOS analog switch (respectively a transfer gate in the digital world), either the NMOS or the PMOS transistor or both of them will have an inversed gate voltage in off-state.
It should be also noted that the usual small signal MOS transistors are symmetrical and don't have dedicated source are drain terminals. In case of analog switches or transfer gates, the source and drain role can change in operation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?