Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

HFSS simulation results differ from IEEE paper results simulated with HFSS

Status
Not open for further replies.

rizoeda

Member level 1
Member level 1
Joined
Jan 29, 2016
Messages
34
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Edinburgh, Scotland
Activity points
1,505
Hi guys
Iv'e simulated an EBG structure described in IEEE paper simulated with HFSS but my results are very far from the paper's results. What's my mistakes?
It's a fat-dipole antenna above an EBG structure. See it.
**broken link removed**
Substrate is FR4 (relative permittivity 4.5) and all dimentions described in the paper:
Ultrathin UHF Broadband Antenna on a Nonuniform Aperiodic Metasurface
Iv'e used PEC for ground plane, microstrip patches, and the antenna. Iv'e used copper for 2mm diameter vias. Iv'e used driven telminal analysis with 1mm width lumped port touching two parts of diploe. Radiation boundry is a 500mm radious sphere (adequately far from the radiating parts).
The VSWR should be under 3 in 430 MHz to 650 MHz as you can see:
**broken link removed**
But there is no vswr less than 5 in my results!:thumbsdown: What's the matter?
 

Your attachments don't work.

Just because you used the same software and physical setup doesn't mean you should expect the same results. What convergence criteria did you use? Did you specify a seed mesh? What's your final tetrahedron count?

The mesh quality has the possibility of drastically altering results.
 
Hi PlanarMetamaterial! Hi BradtheRad :thumbsup: I attach the paper and project file [later].

fat dipole -on EBG Config.jpg

I hope attachment be valid this time.

Also I should mention that I've left mesh settings as default!:oops: Can you/anyone skim the project file and tell me the necessary mesh setting changes?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

and dears here is the result of the paper
vswr.jpg
but my results are very high, there is no vswr under 5.:-(
 

Create a vacuum object that represents the gaps between the Sievenpiper mushroom structures. Then assign this a seed mesh of length equal to half the gap length.

Set delta S of the convergence to 0.01, and have the simulation do two converged passes instead of just one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top