help for PCB antenna

Status
Not open for further replies.
T

tomars

Junior Member level 2
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
23
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
128
I have added dipolo antenna to My PCB (Right)
I need 433 Mhz anetnna
There are also RFIS 13Mhz coil and Touch key on same PCB
Measuring with NanoVna I have the resonance at 300 MHz
I lost half a day to remove two turns at a time, and re measured, but the only thing that changed were decibel, the frequency changed a little.
Perhaps they affect other parts of the circuit too much ?
What can I try ?







[ Moderator action ] : Fixed typo on title
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sort by date Sort by votes
Without seeing your measurement setup, we can't know which resonance your are actually seeing. It might be just a feed cable sheet resonance.

I don't understand how you are matching the differential dipole to the apparently single ended transceiver output.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
I think the spacing between turns in your meander antenna is too small.
If the spacing is too small, the cross-coupling between elements will affect antenna resonance, antenna efficiency, and antenna polarization.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote







--- Updated ---

vfone said:
I think the spacing between turns in your meander antenna is too small.
If the spacing is too small, the cross-coupling between elements will affect antenna resonance, antenna efficiency, and antenna polarization.
Click to expand...
The length of the single track is 330 mm, width 0.25 mm
330 top + 330 bottom

I also tried two triangles, but the measurements are disastrous.
I would like to increase the bandwidth, to reduce the influence that external conditions have.


 
Last edited:

Upvote 0 Downvote

Upvote 0 Downvote
Not, do not change touching VNA or cable.
Only change moving antenna.

Any advice on making an antenna more immune to other parts of the PCB ?
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
As the others already mentioned, a symmetric antenna (dipole) for an asymmetric feed isn't a good idea, unless you use a balun. In addition, the nearby PCB ground edge will affect dipole impedance.

Have a look at monopole-style antennas like the F antenna, which use the PCB ground as antenna ground. This will also save space. Overview appnote by TI: https://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra161b/swra161b.pdf
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
But inverted F only i found GHZ
In this pdf and online.
Only i have 80mm
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
tomars said:
But inverted F only i found GHZ
Click to expand...

I recommended the F antenna because that works well with the radiator parallel to PCB ground. But yes, it is not simple to design an efficient 433 MHz antenna for your small PCB.

You can try meandering the radiator, like you did for the dipole. But that is limited, not sure if it works.

From my experience with PCB antenna design: the dipole is not a useful solution here.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
TI has some application notes about Sub-GHz antenna. Appended AN003 seems to be no longer available at ti.com

As a general consideration for electrical small antenna, the smaller the antenna compared to wavelength, the lower the radiation resistance and bandwidth and the higher the resonance Q. Respectively the stronger de-tuning by hand effect.

A symmetrical dipole doesn't utilize the large ground plane to increase the effective antenna size, thus a monople antenna is often preferred for sub-GHz. (Actually it's a kind of asymmetrical dipole with the ground plane acting as second leg).
 

Attachments

  • AN_003_Antennas_1_2.pdf
    355 KB · Views: 169

Upvote 0 Downvote
I can also make it to 433mhz.
Perhaps doubling the coils.
But the problem is that the bandwidth is smaller than the instability due to environmental conditions.
All I have to do is bring my hand closer that the curve comes totally out of the marker.

An antenna with little gain but a large bandwidth would be much better.






--- Updated ---

FvM said:
Consider an unfolded wire length of least lambda/4 (173 mm).
Click to expand...

Monopole /4 require grout bottom.
I have gronud laterally.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote
If your application involves radio transmission, a lossy wide band antenna is rarely a good choice, e.g. due to output power limits for certification.

You should also focus on (expectable) S21 rather than S11. S11 of -10 dB means that still 90% of transmitter power is radiated or absorbed by the antenna.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
Such a small antenna is narrowband, that is physics. If tolerances are an issue, you can introduce loss into your antenna to make it more wideband, at lower gain.

One possibility is to keep the F structure and add R||C at the open end. C will tune frequency down and R adds loss.

I have attached an example of a small 868 MHz antenna (for handheld remote) where that was done: make it wideband and robust by adding the resistor, and accept the resulting low gain. You can try to adopt this concept for our 433 MHz design.
 

Attachments

  • Analysis of a 868MHz loop antenna.pdf
    962.2 KB · Views: 162

Upvote 0 Downvote
Do you have a comparison with and without 2k resistor? I wonder if the resistance value introduces relevant losses.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
FvM said:
Do you have a comparison with and without 2k resistor? I wonder if the resistance value introduces relevant losses.
Click to expand...
This is not my design, I only simulated that many years ago.

To answer your question, I now compared both bases, with and without 2kOhm resistor:



Gain excluding mismatch losses is ~ 11dB higher without the resistor. Adding the resistor reduces gain, but helps with matching.
 

    FvM

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Upvote 0 Downvote
Waooooo
2K Miracle
The only problem is that the thickness of the resistor won't fit, I'll have to hide it inside a downturn.




NO res


2K res
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
Great, glad this works for you!

It seems to me that your antenna test PCB is smaller than the actual device PCB. You need to be aware that antenna tuning also depends on PCB ground size, so you need to tweak with the actual PCB size.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
Not, is same, it is 70 mm high
I'll do one more test with an extra loop and then make a complete PCB with the whole circuit.
It feels like the right way, though.



I am no longer as lost and bewildered as before.

13Mhz RFID coil work also if one layer is covered.



 

Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…