Gapping a ferrite core for Full Bridge SMPS transformer?

Status
Not open for further replies.
What it shows is that current mode control with soft start would be a far safer way to prevent disaster at start up.
 
Reactions: treez

    T

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Thanks, the simulation of post#20 is in current mode.
Even if you have a soft start, it will be ‘dis-armed’ in cases of restart (ie after an OFF-ON incident)
 

The start-up behavior of the circuit seems to be rather chaotic and far from deserving the name "soft-start". It can be surely improved, but as long as current mode prevents large saturation currents, partial core saturation for a few 10 ms or even seconds doesn't hurt.
 
Reactions: treez

    T

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Thanks, indeed the ltspice simulation of post#20 doesn't have a soft start. That is deliberate ,because I wanted it to be like for a non-soft-restart.
but as long as current mode prevents large saturation currents, partial core saturation for a few 10 ms or even seconds doesn't hurt.
Click to expand...
Though what Bmax for a non-gapped core would you say Is allowable?.....the 0.397mT that the sim of post#20 gets to is high, and 10ms is all it needs to start to go into "flyaway" saturation. -Because the sim of post#20 is based on a non-gapped design.
 

what Bmax for a non-gapped core would you say Is allowable?
Click to expand...
No specific limit, a matter of tolerable current and core heating. As thermal time constant is in a several minutes order of magnitude, transient saturation is no thermal problem.
 
Reactions: treez

    T

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
No, if anything it means you need more turns on the transformer. Simply adding a gap won't change flux density, given the same applied volt-time product.
 

OK thanks, just increased the turns while keeping np/ns the same, and the peak flux does indeed go down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Current mode controller current limiting is pulse-by-pulse with little delay. On the other hand, power ferrite saturation characteristic isn't very steep. Why shouldn't the current mode circuit not be able to switch it off safely?

Gapping the core doesn't increase the saturation flux respectively accepted Vdt integral of a transformer, in so far it won't avoid saturation caused by asymmetrical duty cycles as in your simulation.
 

The bottom of the following article states why a gap is good even for a forward type smps transformer....
**broken link removed**

Finally, even discontinuous forward designs will benefit from an air gap, as the residual flux value will be nearer zero, allowing a larger working flux density range.
Click to expand...
 

You'll notice that the consideration doesn't apply to the full bridge forward converter originally discussed in this thread.
 
Reactions: treez

    T

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

Yes this logic seems rock solid to me. From a heating perspective the primary winding can handle X current. If current mode control keeps primary current below X it won't overheat. It doesn't matter whether that current is from a real load or saturation (and in-fact, if saturated there will be no corresponding secondary current, so overall transformer heating is less).
 
Reactions: treez

    T

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…