helgrind
Newbie
Hello,
I'm working to replace a pulse measurement system (from a capacitive pickup) which includes the following isolation and filter stage, but would like to understand a little about the background first. Unfortunately the designer is no longer at the company and there are no design records available. I've been having trouble simulating it in spice, and I wonder how important the transformer impedance is in the response. Note that it is a 9:1 turn ratio.
I have simmed the input LPF successfully, but afaik the bandwidth of the second stage should be around 20 MHz but I am getting a much narrower notch more like 20 kHz, just from the section before the op-amp. I'm also confused that in the second stage, the LPF appears to be before the amp and the HPF after. I thought for an active BPF you normally put them the other way around for compensating nonlinear effects? Unless it's because of impedance reasons here?
Finally, I wonder why the isolating transformer has the caps hung off the grounded side rather than in series with the main output, before the inductors. Would there be an electrical reason for this or just perhaps due to layout reasons?
Any help in analysing this would be much appreciated. The schematic excerpt is at the link below as a png.
Thanks,
Laurence
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VrwqKQ9H0Z4hRwcMSuqyLJRXNm-pTHI3/view?usp=sharing
I'm working to replace a pulse measurement system (from a capacitive pickup) which includes the following isolation and filter stage, but would like to understand a little about the background first. Unfortunately the designer is no longer at the company and there are no design records available. I've been having trouble simulating it in spice, and I wonder how important the transformer impedance is in the response. Note that it is a 9:1 turn ratio.
I have simmed the input LPF successfully, but afaik the bandwidth of the second stage should be around 20 MHz but I am getting a much narrower notch more like 20 kHz, just from the section before the op-amp. I'm also confused that in the second stage, the LPF appears to be before the amp and the HPF after. I thought for an active BPF you normally put them the other way around for compensating nonlinear effects? Unless it's because of impedance reasons here?
Finally, I wonder why the isolating transformer has the caps hung off the grounded side rather than in series with the main output, before the inductors. Would there be an electrical reason for this or just perhaps due to layout reasons?
Any help in analysing this would be much appreciated. The schematic excerpt is at the link below as a png.
Thanks,
Laurence
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VrwqKQ9H0Z4hRwcMSuqyLJRXNm-pTHI3/view?usp=sharing