Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

frequency bin , amplitude and time resolution

Status
Not open for further replies.

stat

Newbie level 3
Newbie level 3
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
32
Can somewone help me with understanding what frequency bin is?
Many strophysical papers use this notation, but i do not understand why i need a frequency bin, i would just Fourier transfom the series and look at the powers and decide what frequency belongs to my signal...

Now, when talking about signal, especially sinusoids, what does Amplitude A of about 8% mean, why "%"? 8% of what?

and the last quostion: one paper says: the signal was binned to a time resolution of ... milliseconds. What ist time resolution in this context?

Can someone help?
 

practical Fourier transforms are done in the digital domain. This implies that the result is a discrete set of values, and not a continuous function of frequency.
Each discrete frequency which is output by the DFT is called a "bin", and covers a range of frequencies. Much like a barchart....

So even though you may have a particular bin with the largest power/ amplitude, it does not necessarily mean that its exact center-point frequency is the max frequency. You need to look at the powers in the adjacent bins (or bars) and do an interpolation to get a more accurate frequency value as the max value. Several fairly simplistic methods have been used for this, each with its pros & cons.

Regarding the 8%, it obviously means a percentage of the total power of the signal in the captured sample. Not amplitude.

Lastly about milliseconds, i'm not sure what is the reference. However a longer sample of your signal which has been sampled at a very high rate would likely give you a more precise (i.e. frequency resolution) than one sampled at a lower rate. I would have to look at a larger context of the paper to say exactly what is meant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stat

    stat

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
thank you for your respond!
In the paper of Israel and Stella, 1996, they write:


"V0332+53 is a 4.4 s X–ray pulsar accreting from a Be star in a transient X–ray binary. Its
light curves are characterised by a pronounced red–noise type variability. The 4.4 s pulsations have a small amplitude (A≃8%; Stella et al. 1985 and references therein). We re–analysed a 4
hr long 1–9 keV light curve obtained on 1984 January 24 with the EXOSAT ME, during which the source was relatively faint (average rate of∼36 counts s^-1). The light curve was binned to a
time resolution of 938 ms and a single sample spectrum calculated over a 16384 point interval ..."


would this provide you some more information?
what do they mean by "average rate of∼36 counts s^-1"?

- - - Updated - - -

by the way, the paper says something about "the binned data", do you think they are still talking about the same thing (in the frequency domain)?
 

Only a little more information.... i'm not an astro expert.

My earlier description of 8% is probably incorrect. From this text it would seem that the 8% refers to the relative amplitude of the pulsars intensity variation with respect to the mean pulsar brightness (or magnitude)

the 36 counts s^-1 means 36 counts / second. S^-1 implies s to power minus 1, or 1/s .

My limited knowledge says that a pulsars absolute magnitude is proportional to its pulsing rate. So i'm not sure why a rate of 36/sec is faint... it must be very very distant !!

the 938 ms and 16384 points issue is still not clear to me ...sorry.
 

thank you :)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top