Ferrite Beads at high frequency

Status
Not open for further replies.

mw_rookie

Member level 2
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
48
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Visit site
Activity points
1,668
Hello,

Looking at the ferrite beads that I could find, a few questions:

1. Are ferrite beads used a chokes at high freq. like 4 GHz and above i.e. are they available at all at that frequency?
2. If not, then when chip inductors are used as RF chokes at higher freq., most manufacturers do not provide the impedance ( R and XL) characteristics for chip inductors. All you know is the SRF. Then, how do we pick the right chip inductor?
3. Also, is it then preferred to have a resistor in series with the chip inductor to emulate(for the lack of a better word) a ferrite bead RF choke?

I'd appreciate any thoughts on the same.

Thanks.
 

1. -3.: Look at "GHz" and "High GHz" ferrite bead series from Murata.

most manufacturers do not provide the impedance ( R and XL) characteristics for chip inductors.
Most manufacturers give L and Q over frequency, so you can well calculate the impedance.
 

a ferrite bead can be thought of as a very lossy inductor, or inductor with very low q. U want such a thing in a power supply line, for instance, because u do NOT want to form banpass filters along a DC bias line. How? Well if u put high q inductors every 2" along a line....when your frequency is such that 2" is around a half wavelength, you have actually formed a bandpass response..which will readily LET the microwaves by th einductors.

If they are lossy inductors, this does not happen, because even IF there were a banpass, its loss would be 30 dB or so.

But ferrites are...just a mash of iron type junk. the composition, grain size, binding material, all causes them to work well at some frequencies, and poorly at others.

If you were interested in 4 Ghz leakage, u would want a ferrite bead that had resistive loss at 4 ghz, maybe peaking at 4.5 ghz, so u have to slog thru the manufacturers data sheets. If by ferrite bead, u mean surface mount chip....that is easier, there will be easy to read test charts on the data sheet. U will find most ferrite beads optimized for << 1` GHz
 
Thanks a ton for the replies.

At the end of another search after reading the replies, I have come across the following:

http://www.ferroxcube.com/prod/assets/MLP.htm[/URL
[URL="https://www.ferroxcube.com/prod/assets/MLS.htm"]https://www.ferroxcube.com/prod/assets/MLS.htm

https://www.ferroxcube.com/prod/assets/MLN.htm

The data for the first few parts in MLN and MLP series is shown only upto 1 GHz. Is it a good idea to test it out? or is it implicit that ferrite beads are not used/optimized above 1 GHz as biff44 pointed out?

I have also looked at the Coilcraft inductors and came across:



How is this working as a wide band RF choke? The impedance vs freq. graph shows a peak below 1000 MHz. So I am unable to understand how this will work up to 6 GHz.

Am I missing something here?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:


Ferrite beads are typically inserted on WIRES, to achieve stability with RF transistors at up to UHF. Above say 1 GHz, no wires are used but stripline or waveguide lines. Also, RF transistors with Fc >3 GHz can oscillate above the desired frequency range. At >1 GHz, MMICs are preferred and such devices are designed to be stable, without ferrite beads (no wires to put on either).
At >1 GHz, most active devices are installed in shielded enclosures that can and do behave as unwanted waveguides and offer feedback to cause instability. Instead of ferrite beads flat patches made of microwave absorbers are used, glued to sensitive places to suppress stray oscillations.
 

The data for the first few parts in MLN and MLP series is shown only upto 1 GHz. Is it a good idea to test it out? or is it implicit that ferrite beads are not used/optimized above 1 GHz as biff44 pointed out?
As previously said, only special types are good for the high GHz range, the shown apparently aren't.

The Murata BLM15g/BLM18G types are said to work upto 6 GHz, unfortunately there analyzer dien't cover the range above 3 GHz, but you can estimate that they are at least a lot better than the regular stuff.

 
Reactions: zltogo

    zltogo

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…