T
The calculation seems incorrect. On the datasheet, tan(delta) is specified at 120Hz. So find ESR at 120Hz first. Therefore, the ESR(at 120Hz) is 0.25 * Xc(at 120Hz) = 0.30 Ohms (overall ESR for the five capacitors in parallel). As ESR does not vary too much with frequency at low frequency range, so consider ESR(at 1Hz)=ESR(at 120Hz)=0.30 Ohms.The tan(delta) for these capacitors is 0.25. Therefore, the ESR is tan(delta) * Xc = 36.2 Ohms. (overall ESR for the five capacitors in parallel)
Thanks, but I cannot find words to this effect in any of the capacitor manufacturers literature..do you have a reference for this?As ESR does not vary too much with frequency at low frequency range, so consider ESR(at 1Hz)=ESR(at 120Hz)=0.30 Ohms.
Do you never look inside the electronic equipment around you? Any off-mains switcher has it. The capacitor used by treez is a common type dedicated for mains connected power supplies. They have specifications which you can (hopefully) rely on.I have not seen a high voltage capacitor since about 40 years ago.
ahsan_i_h clarified that 120 Hz ESR and loss angle specifications aren't valid for 1 Hz. It should be also mentioned that the 0.25 number is a worst case marginal value rather than a typical. You'll find more data in application notes and general product literature. But ESR and ripple current rating are rarely specified below 10 Hz or even for 1 Hz, so you are required to measure yourself. The intended capacitor operation conditions sound moderate compared to the inrush currents capcitors have to bear, Nevertheless I'm not sure about average power dissipation and long term reliability. But you surely don't get the infomation by extrapolating datasheet numbers.Thanks, but I cannot find words to this effect in any of the capacitor manufacturers literature..do you have a reference for this?
Thanks, but I cannot find words to this effect in any of the capacitor manufacturers literature..do you have a reference for this?
ESR changes with C , V , size , temp but ESR does not change with f when f is low enough to neglect L. i.e. ESR is constant and not changing with 1 Hz cycle rate.
Thanks Electrician, your results have dreadful meaning for the manufacturers of amber led warning beacons if they are using electrolytics at the input to the switch mode led driver, because the flash frequency is typically about 1 or 2 Hz, and so the electrolytics are going to be well overheating, from the fundamental.
The measurements are quite congruent with the informations in capacitor application literature, e.g. from Epcos. Do I guess right this already a low impedance high ripple current capacitor, e.g. PJ series?My experience suggests that this is not true. Here is a sweep of a Nichicon 220 uF 100 VDC electrolytic on an impedance analyzer, showing impedance (green) and ESR (yellow) over a frequency range from 4 Hz to 1 MHz, with markers at 4 Hz and 120 Hz. The ESR rises substantially at low frequencies; it's more than 10 times greater at 4 Hz (2.25 ohms) than it is at 120 Hz (.163 ohms).
The measurements are quite congruent with the informations in capacitor application literature, e.g. from Epcos. Do I guess right this already a low impedance high ripple current capacitor, e.g. PJ series?
Thanks, but I cannot find words to this effect in any of the capacitor manufacturers literature..do you have a reference for this?
For simplicity, the word ESR (equivalent series resistance) is often used to represent the actual series resistance of the capacitor (total resistance of electrolytes,foils,terminals etc). I also used the word in that sense. To calculate generated heat in the capacitors for your application, you need to know actual series resistance rather than ESR (at 1Hz).
At very low frequency (1Hz), the ESR mostly represents equivalent series resistance for leakage current loss. It does not represent the actual series resistance. In your application where high discharge current take place, it would be wrong if you try to calculate I2R loss using the value of ESR(at 1Hz). In my opinion, the ESR at 4Hz from post #12 is not near actual series resistance, most of its part is representing leakage current loss.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?