Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Drive MOSFET from a Transister o/p PWM controller(mc34963)

Status
Not open for further replies.

grittinjames

Advanced Member level 1
Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
479
Helped
44
Reputation
90
Reaction score
32
Trophy points
1,308
Location
bangalore india
Activity points
3,985
Drive MOSFET from a Transister o/p PWM controller(mc34063)

Hello,
This circuit will help you to use low cost PWM controller like MC34063 to drive mosfet
 

Attachments

  • mosfet driver.jpg
    mosfet driver.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 198
Last edited:

MC34063 already has a MOSFET driver incorporated in it. So you don't need this circuit. Moreover, this circuit only improves in discharging the gate quickly by grounding it. A better circuit would be a totem-pole circuit which both sources and sinks current to the gate very quickly.
 

Hi Tahmid,
Are you sure MC34063 have mosfet driver? I request you to varify it again on Datasheet.
Grittin
MC34063 already has a MOSFET driver incorporated in it. So you don't need this circuit. Moreover, this circuit only improves in discharging the gate quickly by grounding it. A better circuit would be a totem-pole circuit which both sources and sinks current to the gate very quickly.
 

Okay, the introduction says it contains a driver, but upon close inspection, I see that you are right. The driver can not be used to directly drive a MOSFET very efficiently without the use of external transistor, etc.

If you are powering the MC34063 with 12v or more, then your circuit is fine and all good.

On the other hand, the UC384x series of controllers have integrated totem-pole drivers.

Hope this helps.
Tahmid.
 

UC384X usually ment for higher voltage aplications, were primary current is less. Also both are working in enterly different principle.
The current sense voltage of UC384X is above 1V were MC34063 got nearly 300mV
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top