I have read in one application note about troubleshooting of crystal oscillation troubleshooting that one possible cause of troubles in a circuit, like for example having a crystal is the PCB contaminants like flux, does it?
this is the article link:
**broken link removed**
"PCB contaminants, like flux, humidity, and finger prints, can reduce the impedance between nodes, which in turn can create a number of issues".
this the part of the application note that I am saying. It is at #12part.
I´d say it is not very likely, but possible.
Some flux residuals are hygroscopic, some have high or low pH. Some are slightely conductive (megaohms), some act like a dielectric.
Therefore they change ohmic and capacitive coupling on a PCB. Therefore with sensitive circuits there still is the need for cleaning the PCB.
I´d say it is not very likely, but possible.
Some flux residuals are hygroscopic, some have high or low pH. Some are slightely conductive (megaohms), some act like a dielectric.
Therefore they change ohmic and capacitive coupling on a PCB. Therefore with sensitive circuits there still is the need for cleaning the PCB.
I would agree with the previous posts "I´d say it is not very likely, but possible." I have never had any problems caused by flux residue even on sensitive circuits, I think that flux removal is more cosmetic than anything else. Saying that I don't know what flux you are using maybe some different fluxes to the ones I use can cause problems.
Definitely not.
Modern "no clean" flux residuals are almost invisible. So there is no need for "cosmetics".
In opposite to this: Often when "no clean" flux PCBs are cleand the still remaining residuals are awful. Now the last couple of % are visible. (With heat you can make it invisible again. )
***
I agree that in many cases the flux is not problematic. Controlling a LED for example. Who cares about a couple of nanaoamperes fluctuating LED current.
But with an Xray dosemeter, we trigger at about 3..10 picoamperes. It´s less than 1/100 of a nanoampere...You see what I mean?
***
Back to XTALs.
Sometimes there is a high ohmic resistor - some megaohms - across the XTAL to ensure startup.
Depending on the oscillator circuit there is a little possibilty that leakage currents caused by flux residuals prevent the oscillator from starting.
As said before: not very likely, but possible.
When I was a young technician we built large complex
logic boards out of LSTTL (Woot! Woot!) and TI9900
16-bit uPs, all soldered up by hand. At one point we
used a different solder vendor and the flux residue
grew conductive mold, lost us a whole customer's
worth of systems (and the only paying customer at
the time). Shortly after that, the company folded that
division and I went on unemployment.
So, yeah. Probabilities don't mean Jack when it's you
that got the lucky ticket. Luck perhaps being only
somebody else's occasional carelessness, randomly.