Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Do we need set_clock_uncertainty in post-layout timing analysis?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ahmad898

Junior Member level 3
Junior Member level 3
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Messages
26
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
187
I know that set_clock_uncertainty is for taking the clock skew and jitter into account during pre-layout timing analysis. But, after post P&R we have a propagated clock where the skew is known. My question is that if I put the set_clock_uncertainty contraint in sdc for post P&R STA, does it increase the pessemism in hold analysis? In my opinion, we can set set_clock_uncertainty only for considering the jitter in post layout and to increase the pessemism we can use the set_timing_derate. However, the jitter does not affect the hold, so the use of set_clock_uncertainty is meaningless in post layout hold analysis. Is that right?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top