Difference in performance/behavior by loading location ?

Externet

Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Jan 29, 2004
Messages
635
Helped
28
Reputation
58
Reaction score
31
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Mideast US
Activity points
6,385
Hello all.

A 50Ω wideband impedance transmitter [TX] connected to a RG58 coaxial [====] and to an antenna; in two configurations :

TX=R================================================= aerial

TX==================================================R aerial

Where R is a 50 ohm non-inductive resistor loading at the TX output connector; or, placed at the aerial end of the coaxial (in parallel to the RF line.)
What differences to expect in behavior / impedance / SWR / performance / attenuation for each case ?
 

Sort by date Sort by votes
The key difference between the two configurations is where the 50Ω termination resistor (R) is placed. In
Configuration 1, the resistor (R) is placed at the transmitter (TX) end. In Configuration 2, The resistor (R) is placed at the antenna end.
In con 1,the transmitter sees a perfectly matched 50Ω load right at its output. However, the coaxial cable will not necessarily see a matched termination at the antenna side. In Configuration 2: the coaxial cable is correctly terminated at its end with 50Ω, meaning it behaves as a matched transmission line. The transmitter sees whatever impedance is reflected back from the antenna system.




 

Upvote 0 Downvote
Thanks. Yes, as shown. A 50Ω R at one end of the coaxial or at the other end.
In configuration 1 the transmitter 'sees' a 50Ω coaxial in parallel with 50Ω, not exactly 'perfectly matched' , or is it ?
In configuration 2 the coaxial 'sees' the antenna is in parallel with 50Ω, not exactly 'correctly terminated' , or Is it ?
What are the effects of each ?
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
Neither configuration makes sense. Transmitter should be more or less matched to transmission line, additional resistor according to config 1 kills the matching. Effect of config 2 depends on antenna impedance. Ideally antenna has 50 ohm impedance, in this case it's already matched to coaxial cable and a resistor causes mismatch and signal attenuation.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
Externet said:
What are the effects of each ?
Click to expand...
In case 2, the line is matched to the transmitter output impedance, and the length of the line doesn't matter. No impedance transformation here. The transmitter will "see" the resistor in parallel to the antenna impedance.

In case 1, the antenna impedance will be transformed to some value that depends on line length and wave length, so it varies with frequency. This frequency dependent (transformed) value will be in paralell to the resistor.

So in case 1, line length matters.
In case 2 it doesn't matter.
 

    Externet

    Points: 2
    Applause ! Thank you.
Upvote 0 Downvote
A simulation using a short 1m RG58 coax cable, shows that S21=-0.25dB and S11=-25dB.
50 ohms resistors placed either at the input or at the output, degrades S21=-3.8dB and S11=-10dB.

Using a long 20m RG58 without 50 ohms resistors, S21=-4.9dB and S11=-30dB.
The same 20m RG58 coax cable, with 50 ohms resistors placed at its ends, shows that the resistors (wherever they are placed) degrades the transmission line insertion loss S21=-8.2dB. Return loss S11 is better with 50 ohms resistor placed at the output compared to the input (-22dB vs -10dB).

In all cases a 50 ohms antenna was assumed at the output, and frequency of 50MHz.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
vfone said:
20m RG58
frequency of 50MHz
Click to expand...
50 Mhz -> wavelength is 6m
20m x factor 0.66 = 30m

In your testcase, the cable length is a multiple of lambda/2, so impedance transformation will give you Zin=Zout
You should try again with cable length lambda/4

--- Updated ---


Let's assume we have an antenna with 200 Ohm input impedance. Cable length is 90° = lambda/4 at 50 MHz.





--- Updated ---

If the resistor is in series (not shunt), it looks like this:



 
Last edited:
Reactions: Externet

    Externet

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Upvote 0 Downvote
The impedance mismatches in coaxial cables, theoretically appears only if the coaxial cable is too long or is improperly terminated.
In our case, when using 50 ohms resistors placed in parallel to the input and to the output, the RG58 coax cable is improperly terminated which cause reflections.

We are doing simulations using ideal coaxial cables. In reality, coaxial cable impedance is more dependent by its length due to cable imperfections. RG58 is a cheap cable, and is not keeping well its impedance vs length. For example an LMR-200 coax cable behaves totally different when is about multiples of wavelength.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
vfone said:
RG58 is a cheap cable, and is not keeping well its impedance vs length. For example an LMR-200 coax cable behaves totally different when is about multiples of wavelength.
Click to expand...
As an RF professional, I don't agree. RG58 is homogenous along its length, so it keeps impedance vs. length.
Everything else is math that can be derived using the proper cable specs.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
All quantitative parameters in this thread (cable length, frequency, antenna impedance) have been guessed by contributors, no useful info given by original poster.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
If you read carefully you will see that the original post does not mention the length of the cables, which had to be chosen somehow. And I think it is better to choose them randomly than depending on the wavelength.
As an RF professional, unfortunately, I had very, very bad experiences using RG58 coax cables.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…