Difference between STI and LOCOS

Status
Not open for further replies.

raj_007

Newbie level 4
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
5
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Visit site
Activity points
1,314
Hi,

Please can anyone answer why STI is preferred instead of LOCOS in mosfet.


Thanks
 

LOCOS is a classical oxidation process, steam or dry. It
can't be patterned especially fine and can't go deep or at
high aspect ratio.

A trench etch with either a refill or a sidewall reox can be
cut finer and deeper, enabling better isolation* and packing

* the quality of oxide surface being critical

The preference is stronger as you challenge active-active
spacings, and as those spacings (rather than intradevice
dimensions) begin to dominate functional packing density.
However LOCOS still has huge cost advantages where it
will work - I am familiar with some FDSOI technologies
where the very thin film makes LOCOS perfectly viable
because the aspect ratio is low (<0.1um film, 1um active-
active spacing). If you wanted a 0.5um deep isolation
and a 0.2um active-active, though, you'd have no choice
but STI.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…