Dielectric Resonator coupled to TWO microstrips

Status
Not open for further replies.

gecky

Full Member level 2
Joined
Aug 13, 2004
Messages
127
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,428
card trans-tech resonator

Hi

I need to model the circuit of a dielectric resonator coupled to 2 microstrips (used in parallel feedback).

I know that the equilvalent circuit is a RLC coupled to either microstrip by transformers. However, texts and technical papers I found seem to avoid explaining the resultant impedence looking towards the DR from the microstrip ends for such configuration.

At best, the transformed RLC values for the DR coupled to 1 microstrip may be found using software provided by manufacturers (eg Trans-Tech's CARD program). Coupling coefficient is given but that is onli good for coupling with 1 microstrip.

Thanks in advance!
 

The ADS2003 has the model built inside, I remember.
Try that .
 

Hi

thanks for the reply. I looked... the model given in ADS2003c is that of a DR coupled to 1 microstrip

I need a relation between coupling factor and turn ratio of the transformers so that i may enter the required model as such:
1<--transformer-->RLC<--transformer-->2

The ends 1 & 2 are the microstrips.
 

Hi,
Use and ideal transformer for each side of the RLC equivalent circuit. Bu playing with the K coupling factor you can tune the coupling coeficient.
If you use ADS I can send you the circuit.

D.J
 

you can use hfss to simulate it
 

Thanks guys!

danelad:
Use and ideal transformer for each side of the RLC equivalent circuit. By playing with the K coupling factor you can tune the coupling coeficient.

Just to reiterate, am I right in saying that all I have to do is adjust the turn ratio,T, of the ideal transformer to obtain the coupling coef,k, i need?

In that case is the relationship: k=T^2*R/Zo . R being the resistance of the equilvalent circuit and Zo the characteristic impedence.

By plugging values obtained from transTech's CARD software, I always get T=2^(-0.5) regardless of what k is. This seem to mean that R is already the transformed resistance...

This is quite lenghty, hope you can understand my situation
Maybe you could also mail me the ADS file at lostgecky@yahoo.com so I can see what you mean.

Thanks!
 

Anyone else can help?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…