Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Deriving mosfet differential current expressions

Status
Not open for further replies.

promach

Advanced Member level 4
Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
1,202
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,318
Activity points
11,643
Could anyone help to derive mosfet differential current expression (9.4) ?

Note: Screenshot taken from book "Low-power-wireless-communication-circuits-and-systems-60GHz-and-beyond"

hyvYhCZ.png
 

Could be a bit hard, because Lambert W function is not an elementary function.
If you would like to deriv similar formula using square law approximation, check Gray, Hurst, Meyer book "Analysis and Design...", chapter related to diff pairs.
 

edaboard_proof.png
See the attached image for the proof of 9.4.

Edit: If you want the proof for MOSFETs, it can be found in Razavi's 'Fundamental of Microelectronics'. I have extracted the most important parts of the expressions..
edabaord_2.JPG
 
Last edited:
In the proof for BJT , why do you add Io (DC bias point current) ?

I thought gmc*V1 is the total current flowing through the bottom mosfet (or in your proof, a current source) ?
 

@FvM

Io + gmc*V1 is just copied from post #1...

Where ? The book screenshot itself does not even indicate what exactly "Io" refers to.

I have checked the whole section of the chapter, there is no mention about Io.

Why you call "Io" as DC bias point current ?
 

I thought gmc*V1 is the total current flowing through the bottom mosfet (or in your proof, a current source) ?
But that is just the small signal current. All of these expressions were derived NOT assuming small signal models (and thus all the complicated expressions)... And thus, I assumed the DC component of the tail current is Io.

EDIT 1: (Some more comments)


I cannot see it being anything other than a DC component anyway.
 
The nature of Io as bias current is suggested by using a capital letter, also by symmetry considerations, you have i0a=Io+gmc*v1 and i0b=Io-gmc*v1.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top