Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[SOLVED] Delta Vbe current mirror and BJT question

Status
Not open for further replies.

AMSA84

Advanced Member level 2
Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Messages
577
Helped
8
Reputation
16
Reaction score
8
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Iberian Peninsula
Activity points
6,178
Hi guys,

I am designing a delta vbe current reference with a PTAT and CTAT current current references that will be summed out.

The question I want to ask is the following: Since the CTAT current reference has only 1 BJT and the PTAT current reference has 1 BJT + 8 BJT, can I use the same node from the 1 BJT voltage from the PTAT current reference into the 1 BJT CTAT current reference, instead of using one more BJT in that current reference (CTAT)? This way I would stay only with one matrix 3x3 and not with 3x3 + 1.

I don't know if there are some implications doing this.

Regards. Thanks in advance.
 

You shouldn't do this. Why? Because your original current ratio of 1:8 is gone, and I doubt it will be easy to get a good compensation.

If yo want to stay with a 3x3 array, you'd better reduce the 1:8 ratio to a 1:7 ratio. Remember you can use any ratio, just the relation between lnA (A=ratio) and the resistor ratio must be correct.
 

If you mean hanging another base off the {1X, 8X+res} base
node, I think the question becomes about the excess base
current, where it comes from and what it costs (e.g. more
curvature / low temp deflection). Without a schematic to
look at I can only speculate broadly.

Since references only are used 1X or few-X per chip, is
optimizing layout area and array size really a big deal?
It's not like squeezing square microns out of a DFF that's
going to be used thousands of times. I think this is more
about quality of the reference than gross area etc. And
what specifically is wrong about a 4x4, 1:14+1 array
other than square microns again? More local current gain is
not often a bad idea, helping some with PSRR and startup.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top