grizedale
Advanced Member level 3
Hello,
The following shows how parallel led strings can be driven from a single current source and still have matched current............
**broken link removed**
However, over the typical +/-20% difference in led V(f) value, this would mean (in worst case) potentially 2W of dissipation in one of the BJT's of the current mirror. (considering 350mA led current.)
So how can this method be put forward realistically......its far too dissipative.?
One of the worst thing is that the reference BJT has to be the one in series with the highest voltage led string.....bu since you wouldnt know which string that may be you have to add a series resistor in the reference string so that it is definetly the one with highest voltage.....such a resistor adds even more to the dissipation.
Am i right to consider v(f) with +/-20% tolerance, and can you also see that this method is far too dissipative to be realistic, let alone the cost of matched bjt's
The following shows how parallel led strings can be driven from a single current source and still have matched current............
**broken link removed**
However, over the typical +/-20% difference in led V(f) value, this would mean (in worst case) potentially 2W of dissipation in one of the BJT's of the current mirror. (considering 350mA led current.)
So how can this method be put forward realistically......its far too dissipative.?
One of the worst thing is that the reference BJT has to be the one in series with the highest voltage led string.....bu since you wouldnt know which string that may be you have to add a series resistor in the reference string so that it is definetly the one with highest voltage.....such a resistor adds even more to the dissipation.
Am i right to consider v(f) with +/-20% tolerance, and can you also see that this method is far too dissipative to be realistic, let alone the cost of matched bjt's