hi and thanks for the replyThis circuit operates by a common base DC voltage modulating the emitter to oscillate in phase with the collector with gain >1. Most of the time Vbe is reverse biased but when Vc drops in phase with Ve, Vbe which becomes forward biased at 0.6V and creates an impulse of Ic current which pulls down Vc and Ve until the C2 coupled voltage decays. This positive feedback creates a high current impulse about 1% of the frequency then for 99% of the time the transistor current is zero.and the LC circuit just rings being much lower impedance than Rc=47k.
The output voltage envelope declines well below Vcc at steady state and the impulse current changes shape but continues to distort the sinewave voltage output for a small portion of the cycle, thus not being a clean ~1 MHz Sine Oscillator. It pings from Vbe to Ic impulses and the positive feedback DC gain of Rc/Re is sufficient to keep it oscillating. ping ping ping.
It needs work to improve, I would suspect to meet the design expectations. What design specs do you have?
View attachment 186558
--- Updated ---
With L on the collector to Vcc, you can expect Vc to rise "towards" double the supply Vcc with ideal oscillations. But damping impedance reduces the envelope size.
iWithout simulating the given circuit, I'd expect strong distortions due to large feedback factor. You can try to play with C1/C2 ratio to tune it. But reducing feedback will result in lower output voltage and increased load sensitivity.
* It is a common base configuration due to the capacitor C4.;
- i know that for oscillation, there must be positive feedback. where is positve feedback?plz,explain
- what is roles of c3 and c4 ?
iWithout simulating the given circuit, I'd expect strong distortions due to large feedback factor. You can try to play with C1/C2 ratio to tune it. But reducing feedback will result in lower output voltage and increased load sensitivity.
hiI have difficulties to get sien waveform with present circuit. Used more standard colpitts:
View attachment 186565
iWithout simulating the given circuit, I'd expect strong distortions due to large feedback factor. You can try to play with C1/C2 ratio to tune it. But reducing feedback will result in lower output voltage and increased load sensitivity.
hiI have difficulties to get sien waveform with present circuit. Used more standard colpitts:
View attachment 186565
hiThis circuit operates by a common base DC voltage modulating the emitter to oscillate in phase with the collector with gain >1. Most of the time Vbe is reverse biased but when Vc drops in phase with Ve, Vbe which becomes forward biased at 0.6V and creates an impulse of Ic current which pulls down Vc and Ve until the C2 coupled voltage decays. This positive feedback creates a high current impulse about 1% of the frequency then for 99% of the time the transistor current is zero.and the LC circuit just rings being much lower impedance than Rc=47k.
The output voltage envelope declines well below Vcc at steady state and the impulse current changes shape but continues to distort the sinewave voltage output for a small portion of the cycle, thus not being a clean ~1 MHz Sine Oscillator. It pings from Vbe to Ic impulses and the positive feedback DC gain of Rc/Re is sufficient to keep it oscillating. ping ping ping.
It needs work to improve, I would suspect to meet the design expectations. What design specs do you have?
View attachment 186558
--- Updated ---
With L on the collector to Vcc, you can expect Vc to rise "towards" double the supply Vcc with ideal oscillations. But damping impedance reduces the envelope size.
Don't agree with explanation. As shown in post #6, you get good sine waveform with slight circuit modifications (towards a standard colpitts). Problem of original circuit is I think, that 47k resistor and C3 make it difficult to get a stable operation point. Usual colpitts circuit doesn't have it.as i know, we first do dc analysis. because l1 is connected to vcc, the output( collector of transitor) is biased at vcc and there is not room for output voltage , so it must cause very large distortion.
hiThe Colpitts in OP's post is the type that has the power supply in the resonating loop. This is not necessarily bad although it has current flowing back and forth through the power supply. Various influences (known and unknown) may enter in.
There are other configurations where the LCC tank resonates without any other component in the resonant path. That type may yield a sinewave which is less distorted. Example below. Notice current drawn from the supply is a small fraction of current that builds in the LCC tank.
View attachment 186568
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?