Thanks, i know you mean "gases".
..if one observes the schem on page 17 of the TIDA-00756 in the top post, it is pretty simple....but the circuit that our consulatncy has done for us is way way bigger than this.....it has more than 6 times that component count. Would you say that page 17 schem of TIDA00756 is a very over-simplified schem?
In the circuit that they have done for us, i am trying to trace the actual feedback circuit of the opamp....(they use one opamp like in TIDA00756)...but it seems un-trace-able....it seems to go off in every direction with all kinds of subcircuits thrown into it. I just spent an hour trying to re-draw it but still cant get the hang of it. So do you say that the TIDA00756 schem is over-simpliifed?
The output of the cct is read by micro ADC, and when the micro wants to read the output, it appears that it pulses a FET on/off at the output and this fet shunts the signal to ground and the fet is in series with a BJT which also has its base capacitor coupled to the output. The Micro output that pulses the cct when it wants an adc reading also pulses an RC cct to ground which is partially across the CO sensor.......the sensor is not to ground, but is on top of a divider voltage...like its biased up above ground (maybe they originally used a opamp which wasnt R2R input?
Anyway, what say you about this consultancys cct?...does it sound laudible?
Also, their cct only uses a 1n feedback cap on the opamp. Also, the RF appears to be some 800kR.
But their look to be some other Rs in pllel to this and are switchable.
There are also other weirdness's about the circuit but i harp on too much already.
So , whats wrong with the TIDA00756 CO sensor cct.....is it over-simplified. ?