CD4050 is a terrible choice, it’s well over 30 years old. There are MUCH better options. Further, the CD4050 can only source 3 mA. You’d need 8 of them in parallel (1.3 packages) per signal.The setup sounds vaguely similar to Ethernet equipment, in the sense the cable has several wires, uses a few twisted pairs and a few not twisted. Ethernet carries data several feet and you need to carry data several feet.
I guess you don't need ethernet hookup nevertheless you can test whether twisted pairs (differential signaling) are any more reliable than single-ended shielded wiring. It depends on how much interference you're exposed to for 30 meters distance.
Buffer IC's include cmos 4050 (non-inverting) or else strings of 4049 4069 inverters. Attach a few in parallel if you need a wire to deliver higher current. Investigate 3.3 V devices to see what's available today.
Place the buffer IC's at each end. Why risk your microcontrollers? Send from a micro to a nearby buffer. Receive 30 meters away through a bit of waveform conditioning to a buffer.
I suppose differential signaling requires twice as many parts and twice as many tests for continuity.
--- Updated ---
Carrying load current is a job for wires of course. Do you wish to send data back from the remote location? Did you rule out home-brew wireless transmission via light or laser or fiber, or radio?
Right.Hi,
and the relay is driven by 0V LOW and 3.3V HIGH?
I´ve rarely seen relays for 3.3V ... and they usually are not driven push AND pull.
***
And no LOW level is specified by a single value "0V" ... but usually with a valid RANGE. The same is true for HIGH levels.
*****
And why don´t you go the most straight forward way:
If you want to drive relays ... why not simply do a search for a relay driver IC?
And if that is not what you are looking for ... then tell us why not.
Is it really asking too much?
Klaus
I realise it. Thanks.Right.
Or, maybe you'd want to use an open-collector/open-drain driver or transistor array.
OP, if you had initially stated that you were trying to drive relays, you'd save a lot of wasted time.
It's a relay.I think that line length wants controlled impedance
(like shared CAT5 cables could be good for RS-422,
RS-485 or LVDS). Noise environment and channel
switching period would drive selection of standard.
RS-422 parts for 3.3V supply are few or none,
although a bipolar type would work OK albeit
reduced level / noise margin. You'd need a
corresponding RX at the other end if you want
the noise / common mode rejection attributes.
Which give 30' distance, might well be significant.
Yes, looks like. But we didn't yet hear clearly if it's a 3.3V relay directly powered through 10 m cable. Stated 25 mA load current suggests this, although 80 mW coil power refers to a tiny reed relays only. Could be so easy by starting the thread with a clear description.It's a relay.
It doesn't need controlled impedance. It doesn't need differential signaling. It doesn't need noise margin. It doesn't need common mode rejection. It doesn't need a receive at the other end.
I agree ...It's a relay.
It doesn't need controlled impedance. It doesn't need differential signaling. It doesn't need noise margin. It doesn't need common mode rejection. It doesn't need a receive at the other end.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?