Today at 12:21 PM #1 N newbie_hs Full Member level 2 Joined Mar 4, 2023 Messages 131 Helped 1 Reputation 2 Reaction score 1 Trophy points 18 Activity points 1,039 Hi, I am designing with Buck boost converter with the following parameters: Vin: 2.5 - 4.2 V Vout: 3.3V Iout Max: 1A Fsw: 1250Khz (From Dtasheet Page 3) Mine is a battery powered application. The inductor design calculation in the datasheet is given below. I believe the 0.3A is the allowed ripple current.Please correct me if I am wrong. The datasheet also says the below thing. When I plug my values in the above equation I am getting L1 = 1.89uH and L2 = 1.62uH. I have 2 Questions: May I know where I went wrong. How they obtained the recommended value of 1.5uH to 4.7uH
Hi, I am designing with Buck boost converter with the following parameters: Vin: 2.5 - 4.2 V Vout: 3.3V Iout Max: 1A Fsw: 1250Khz (From Dtasheet Page 3) Mine is a battery powered application. The inductor design calculation in the datasheet is given below. I believe the 0.3A is the allowed ripple current.Please correct me if I am wrong. The datasheet also says the below thing. When I plug my values in the above equation I am getting L1 = 1.89uH and L2 = 1.62uH. I have 2 Questions: May I know where I went wrong. How they obtained the recommended value of 1.5uH to 4.7uH
Today at 3:59 PM #2 KlausST Advanced Member level 7 Joined Apr 17, 2014 Messages 26,161 Helped 4,922 Reputation 9,869 Reaction score 5,771 Trophy points 1,393 Activity points 175,867 newbie_hs said: May I know where I went wrong. Click to expand... ...Why do you call it wrong? Both your values are within the recommended range. Klaus Upvote 0 Downvote
newbie_hs said: May I know where I went wrong. Click to expand... ...Why do you call it wrong? Both your values are within the recommended range. Klaus
Today at 5:08 PM #3 betwixt Super Moderator Staff member Joined Jul 4, 2009 Messages 16,505 Helped 5,157 Reputation 10,347 Reaction score 5,207 Trophy points 1,393 Location Aberdyfi, West Wales, UK Activity points 139,612 Do a search for 1.89uH and 1.62uH inductors and see what is available. Then do the same search for 1.5uH and 4.7uH. Brian. Upvote 0 Downvote
Do a search for 1.89uH and 1.62uH inductors and see what is available. Then do the same search for 1.5uH and 4.7uH. Brian.
Today at 5:28 PM #4 M mtwieg Advanced Member level 6 Joined Jan 20, 2011 Messages 3,904 Helped 1,311 Reputation 2,628 Reaction score 1,435 Trophy points 1,393 Activity points 29,985 newbie_hs said: I believe the 0.3A is the allowed ripple current.Please correct me if I am wrong. Click to expand... Correct. It's unclear why they chose to set ripple current to 0.3A for these equations... newbie_hs said: When I plug my values in the above equation I am getting L1 = 1.89uH and L2 = 1.62uH. I have 2 Questions: May I know where I went wrong. Click to expand... Your calculations correct. newbie_hs said: How they obtained the recommended value of 1.5uH to 4.7uH Click to expand... It's likely that this covers all L1 and L2 values for all possible combinations of Vin (1.8-5.5V) and Vout (1.2-5.5V), with 0.3A of ripple and fsw=1.25MHz. Upvote 0 Downvote
newbie_hs said: I believe the 0.3A is the allowed ripple current.Please correct me if I am wrong. Click to expand... Correct. It's unclear why they chose to set ripple current to 0.3A for these equations... newbie_hs said: When I plug my values in the above equation I am getting L1 = 1.89uH and L2 = 1.62uH. I have 2 Questions: May I know where I went wrong. Click to expand... Your calculations correct. newbie_hs said: How they obtained the recommended value of 1.5uH to 4.7uH Click to expand... It's likely that this covers all L1 and L2 values for all possible combinations of Vin (1.8-5.5V) and Vout (1.2-5.5V), with 0.3A of ripple and fsw=1.25MHz.
Today at 5:31 PM #5 D.A.(Tony)Stewart Advanced Member level 7 Joined Sep 26, 2007 Messages 9,872 Helped 1,855 Reputation 3,711 Reaction score 2,409 Trophy points 1,413 Location Richmond Hill, ON, Canada Activity points 63,148 I would not recommend boosting Vbat down to 2.5V. It should have a UVLO at 3V Upvote 0 Downvote
Today at 6:00 PM #6 N newbie_hs Full Member level 2 Joined Mar 4, 2023 Messages 131 Helped 1 Reputation 2 Reaction score 1 Trophy points 18 Activity points 1,039 KlausST said: ...Why do you call it wrong? Both your values are within the recommended range. Klaus Click to expand... How they decided the range. Why they took 2.2uH --- Updated Today at 6:00 PM --- KlausST said: ...Why do you call it wrong? Both your values are within the recommended range. Klaus Click to expand... How they decided the range. Why they took 2.2uH Upvote 0 Downvote
KlausST said: ...Why do you call it wrong? Both your values are within the recommended range. Klaus Click to expand... How they decided the range. Why they took 2.2uH --- Updated Today at 6:00 PM --- KlausST said: ...Why do you call it wrong? Both your values are within the recommended range. Klaus Click to expand... How they decided the range. Why they took 2.2uH
Today at 6:36 PM #7 KlausST Advanced Member level 7 Joined Apr 17, 2014 Messages 26,161 Helped 4,922 Reputation 9,869 Reaction score 5,771 Trophy points 1,393 Activity points 175,867 No need to be accurate. The regulation loop does it's job. Higher inductivity is more safe but higher cost and size Upvote 0 Downvote
No need to be accurate. The regulation loop does it's job. Higher inductivity is more safe but higher cost and size