Poor and socially unacceptable wording...Poor wording but it means there are two outputs, one for leading phase, one for trailing phase and they are wholly on or off. There is no linear phase difference output as you would get with a PLL, you see a binary on/off output according to the phase difference.
Brian.
Why is it "socially unacceptable"?socially unacceptable wording
Why is it "socially unacceptable"?
It also means that in the US. But it also means "to strike with a sharp noise". Just because it CAN be used in a "socially unacceptable" form doesn't mean it's ALWAYS "unacceptable". If we were to adhere to your concept of what's acceptable, half of the English language would be unusable.
I can most assuredly say, a bang-bang system has nothing to do with sex, any more than does a wood screw.
No question about reproduction being a normal biological process but dual "bangs" as asked by "fun-king" is a bit more than a coincidence.Hi,
While vulgary languagage should be avoided in an international forum ...
S*x per se is nothing "socially unacceptable", instead it should be treataed as it is: the most normal thing in live. Without it neither you, nor any other human, nor any other mammal would exist.
I guess in every language there are words used in different meanings. Rather common.
Klaus
I see no tongue-in-cheek implications in his question.but dual "bangs" as asked by "fun-king" is a bit more than a coincidence.
Seriously, I am not sure what uses are there for bang-bang circuit.I see no tongue-in-cheek implications in his question.
So you think the handle "fun-king" has a sexual reference?
I see no tongue-in-cheek implications in his question.
So you think the handle "fun-king" has a sexual reference?
Really? You see no use for a bang-bang control? (or, perhaps you’d prefer to call it a fornicate-fornicate control) Do you have a thermostat in your house? Have you ever designed a circuit with a comparator? Those are bang-bang controls.Seriously, I am not sure what uses are there for bang-bang circuit.
Implementation-wise: using both clock edges will have burden on timing closure.
FPGAs are not good for controlling delay and the data transitions are meant to be ignored from say a rising edge to a rising edge. For bang-bang to be useful you need to play with constraints and consider probabilities. Overall I will be impressed if this circuit idea works in FPGAs.
The seriously, why are you commenting on something you apparently know little about?Seriously, I am not sure what uses are there for bang-bang circuit.
Another phase detector style is Mueller-Muller phase detector. This is posted by K. Mueller and M. Muller. So the name "Mueller-Muller" is reasonable. But "bang-bang" is nothing to do with its designer Alexander. Why we named it with 'bang-bang'?bang-bang phase detector or Alexander phase detector, What is the meaning of "bang-bang"?
That raises the issue as how names evolve and who names things.Another phase detector style is Mueller-Muller phase detector. This is posted by K. Mueller and M. Muller. So the name "Mueller-Muller" is reasonable. But "bang-bang" is nothing to do with its designer Alexander. Why we named it with 'bang-bang'?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?