Jenifer_gao
Member level 1
Hi All:
I may ask a stupid quesion, but it bothered me for long time. Now I have a system with phase shift of 185°, as a result this system will becomes unstable. I could do some compensation for this system, but it will increase the power. Because power in my design is very strict. I used this system to do a step response simulation with a unity gain feedback configuration. I find it will give me more ringings than that of small phase shift. So I think this big phase shift only affects the settling time. If my system has a relaxed requirement for the settling time, and it is only applied in the large signal step response, this system may still be feasible.
So far I only see the drawback of settling time. If anyone can point out what else harmness of this unstable system in a large signal applicaion. Thanks.
J
I may ask a stupid quesion, but it bothered me for long time. Now I have a system with phase shift of 185°, as a result this system will becomes unstable. I could do some compensation for this system, but it will increase the power. Because power in my design is very strict. I used this system to do a step response simulation with a unity gain feedback configuration. I find it will give me more ringings than that of small phase shift. So I think this big phase shift only affects the settling time. If my system has a relaxed requirement for the settling time, and it is only applied in the large signal step response, this system may still be feasible.
So far I only see the drawback of settling time. If anyone can point out what else harmness of this unstable system in a large signal applicaion. Thanks.
J