Antenna gain and received power. I confuse.

received power

I have a question. If my system has 2 antennas both with 30dBi gain. I feed 0dBm power to the 30dBi antenna and assume the path loss is 20dB. At the receiver I connect a 30dBi antenna to a spectrum analyzer. Am I going to get Pr= Pt+Gt-PL+Gr = 0+30-20+30 = 40 dBm on the spectrum analyzer? Is this really possible?

Thanks

antenna g/t calculations using spectrum analyser

It is possible. This is the reason of using high gain antennas, to minimize the path loss.

Now:
-30dBi antenna gain can get usually with a dish antenna (e.g. 1.8m at 2.4GHz).
-20dB free-space path loss for example at 2.4GHz is about 10cm.

What is the reason to place two 1.8m dishes, face-to-face at 10cm distance?

received antenna gain

Thanks Vfone. It's not a practical problem. I just don't think I can receive 40dBm power from 0 dBm source using passive component (antenna). Maybe I'm wrong?

antenna receiving gain calculation

It is normal to wonder how power can get so high using only the gain of the antennas.

This is the reason why a lot of RF certification specs are placing stringent requirements not only on the maximum conducted output power of the transmitter, but also on the maximum antenna gain of the system.

how i receive more power from antenna

By conservation of energy law, it's of course impossible, to receive a higher power from an antenna than supplying to it by the sender. Would be a nice perpetuum mobile otherwise. One possible systematic error could be in ignoring near field conditions.

isotropic antenna recieved power

If the antenna was amplifying the signal according to the antenna gain then yes it could receive more power, but common sense tells you that it doesn't seem right. The antenna itself cannot amplify a signal, all it can do it try to direct most of the energy in a specific direction. An isotropic antenna is a theoritical antenna that can radiate power equally in all directions. The gain of an antenna is the maximum amount of power it can radiate in specific direction compared to the power an isotropic antenna can radiate in any given direction (since they're all equal).

Your calculations forgot to include the free space loss which is considerably more than the gain of the antenna and is proportional to r^2, r being the distance between both antennas.

Look up or google Friis Transmission equation for more info on the subject.

I hope this helps.

setting vfone antenna direction

Your calculations forgot to include the free space loss

Click to expand...

The above discussion claimed to consider frees-space loss, if you read it thoroughly, it's designated
PL (path loss). I didn't check the calculation, but the assumed distance is far below 10λ, so this can be
reason enough for a wrong result.

antena 30dbi 1.8m

The initial post didn’t specify any working frequency or distance between antennas.
Myself I gave a possible example (at 2.4GHz), which certainly is unrealistic, mainly due to radiating near field region R = (2*D²)/λ.

receive more power friis

Thanks Vfone. It's not a practical problem. I just don't think I can receive 40dBm power from 0 dBm source using passive component (antenna). Maybe I'm wrong?

Click to expand...

You are not wrong in the calculations.
The wrong guess is "path loss is 20dB". In practical it is much more.

[/quote]

distance computation from antenna gain 2.4 ghz

As was stated earlier one can never get more power out of a passive device than one puts in.

A pair of high gain antennas can make a very efficient transmission line. Look up "beam waveguide".

I like to think of this from the viewpoint that the full gain of an antenna is not realized until one is somewhat distant from the particular antenna. Once the pattern has solidified the space loss is greater than the gain.

Another interesting line of study is a comparison to cable or waveguide transmission line loss vs. antennas over long distances. It turns out that the antenna based channels are less lossy.

received power between two antennas

Thanks for all posts. I think I understand now that the condition above cannot happen in real life. So I can l use the equation confidently for my real problem.