Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

A simple question about LDO

Status
Not open for further replies.

hebu

Full Member level 4
Full Member level 4
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
194
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Activity points
1,816
If the Vin=5V, and LDO out=1V.
In addition, the LDO out curent=500mA. Does it mean the current into
the regulator is 100mA?

Thanks,
 

Of course, Io=100mA is no problem!
But i cann't understand Vdrop=4V is named LDO under the condition of Io=500mA.
 

hebu said:
If the Vin=5V, and LDO out=1V.
In addition, the LDO out curent=500mA. Does it mean the current into
the regulator is 100mA?

Thanks,

Lets see do I interpret your question correctly. When there is 500mA of current flow out from the LDO at Vout = 1V, I guess the current flowing into the LDO at the Vin pin will be 500mA too. Therefore, the power efficiency of LDO is:

Efficiency = Pout/Pin ~ 1.0V x 0.5A / 5.0V x 0.5A = 20%

That is a proof that LDO is relative lossy comparing with switching power converter. Moreover, that is also why people would like to reduce the dropout voltage (e.g. different between Vin and Vout for minmiizing power loss).

Hope this help
Scottie
 

500mA is the current provided to the load of the LDO, but the total power consumed by the load of LDO will be VDD * 500mA.
 

I'm sorry. I think I'm confuesed.

1) The meaning of "Low dropout" is the difference between Vin and Vout?
or the source resistance of voltage source is small despite the loading
sinks large current suddenly?
Anybody can tell me what's the correct definition of "LDO"?

2) Why the efficinecy is so bad such as 20%?

3) Often, what's the efficiency of LDO? For example, 3V to 1V.

Added after 3 minutes:

scottieman said:
hebu said:
If the Vin=5V, and LDO out=1V.
In addition, the LDO out curent=500mA. Does it mean the current into
the regulator is 100mA?

Thanks,

Lets see do I interpret your question correctly. When there is 500mA of current flow out from the LDO at Vout = 1V, I guess the current flowing into the LDO at the Vin pin will be 500mA too. Therefore, the power efficiency of LDO is:

Efficiency = Pout/Pin ~ 1.0V x 0.5A / 5.0V x 0.5A = 20%

That is a proof that LDO is relative lossy comparing with switching power converter. Moreover, that is also why people would like to reduce the dropout voltage (e.g. different between Vin and Vout for minmiizing power loss).

Hope this help
Scottie

I can't realize why the current into LDO is such high as 500mA?
Is it a typical case?
Thanks,

Added after 1 minutes:

suria3 said:
500mA is the current provided to the load of the LDO, but the total power consumed by the load of LDO will be VDD * 500mA.

The VDD of this statement is 5V or 1V?
 

hebu said:
1) The meaning of "Low dropout" is the difference between Vin and Vout?
or the source resistance of voltage source is small despite the loading
sinks large current suddenly?
Anybody can tell me what's the correct definition of "LDO"?

Dropout voltage is the source-to-drain voltage (if MOSFET is used) or the emitter-to-collector voltage (if BJT is used) of the power transistor when it is delivering maximum current to the load.

hebu said:
2) Why the efficinecy is so bad such as 20%?

Since LDO is a series regulator, it means the power transistor to deliver current to the load is in between the supply voltage and the load. In other words, the current passing through the power transistor is almost the same as the current passing through the load. Hence, the input power will be ~ Vin*Iin, and output power is Vout*Iout. As mentioned before, Iin ~ Iout, power efficiency will be Vin/Vout. So, the large the voltage difference between Vin and Vout, poor the efficiency it is.

hebu said:
3) Often, what's the efficiency of LDO? For example, 3V to 1V.

~ 33%

hebu said:
I can't realize why the current into LDO is such high as 500mA?
Is it a typical case?
Thanks,

As mentioned above, LDO is a series regulator :)


Hope it helps
Scottie
 

I am also totaly confused about the disccusion above!!!!

LDO is a low-dropout regulator!! That means in the case a battery of lets say provides 1.25 the output voltage can be as high as 1.2 Volts! In your discussion above I realy don't understand the following: Input current of 100mA!!! and output 500mA??!!!. Since usually boosted nmos or pmos are used, the current flowing into drain is the same flowing out of the drain. So, there is something wrong with your considerations. Without caps or inductors you will not be able to achieve a "transormation" - but this is not a ldo, it is called swithed supply.

However, the example with 5V in, 1V out --> so the series transistor has a Vds of 4V, 500mA output --> 2W are dissipated by the ldo, the output power is 500mW and 2.5W have to be delivered by the 5V supply. So you will get an efficency of 0.5W/2.5W = 20%. But the input current is approximately also 500mA and not 100mA!!!
 

Thanks all,

Forgive my big mistake. I don't really know the power electronics.
First, I guess the purpose of regulator is to transform the voltage of
battery from high to low so as to apply a correct voltage to the circuit.
Such as the chip designed in deep-submicron cmos, which we need to
apply a quite low voltage different from system power. Definitely, it's
not a efficient way to perform this.

By the way, why we need LDO regulator rahter than connecting
the battery to the functional circuit directly, since we want to make
a low "dropout" voltage?

Great thanks,
 

eda4you said:
However, the example with 5V in, 1V out --> so the series transistor has a Vds of 4V, 500mA output --> 2W are dissipated by the ldo, the output power is 500mW and 2.5W have to be delivered by the 5V supply. So you will get an efficency of 0.5W/2.5W = 20%. But the input current is approximately also 100mA and not 500mA!!!

Just wonder it is typo or not:

"But the input current is approximately also 100mA and not 500mA!!!"

From my understanding, the input current should be 500mA, since Pin = 2.5W and Vin = 5V.

Scottie
 

scottieman said:
eda4you said:
However, the example with 5V in, 1V out --> so the series transistor has a Vds of 4V, 500mA output --> 2W are dissipated by the ldo, the output power is 500mW and 2.5W have to be delivered by the 5V supply. So you will get an efficency of 0.5W/2.5W = 20%. But the input current is approximately also 100mA and not 500mA!!!

Just wonder it is typo or not:

"But the input current is approximately also 100mA and not 500mA!!!"

From my understanding, the input current should be 500mA, since Pin = 2.5W and Vin = 5V.

Scottie

You are right. Excuse me. Of course the input current is also 500mA.
 

hebu said:
By the way, why we need LDO regulator rahter than connecting
the battery to the functional circuit directly

because we want to provide clear and stable voltage during different and wide load conditions

regards
 

Not only do we need to provide a stable voltage due to loading conditions, but different chips are made from different processes and can only tolerate certain voltages (0.18um vs. 0.8um BCD).
 

in fact,LDO request:low drop voltage ,high efficient,and output cuurent,loop stability.input is 5v,but output is 1v,impossible.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top