Thanks yes, but due to the 90degC spec we cant use electro caps......and the PFC output is 200V.....so due to temp degC we must use Alu Poly caps....
Wet electrolytic caps don't suddenly stop functioning at any specific temperature. One can find many options with rated lifespans at 125C operating temperature. In fact, at a glance I see more options with wet electrolytic caps than solid ones. Not sure what your operating lifespan requirements are though.
there are very few Alu poly offerings at 200V rating.
So? Stack them in series.
On digikey i only find a few 250V Alu Poly caps and they are 100uF and 220uF at the biggest.....and not so physically small.
If physical size is a concern, then even more reason to put the holdup capacitance on the PFC bus. Let's do a simple comparison:
Option A: Holdup is met by capacitance on 40V output
Holdup energy is 20J, Vout is allowed to drop to 30V, therefore the minimum holdup capacitance is Cout*(40^2-30^2)/2=20, so Cout=0.057F. The max energy stored in Cout is (40^2)/2*0.057 = 46.5J, even though you only utilize 20J.
Option B: Holdup is met by PFC bus capacitance. You can design such things such that the nominal bus voltage is arbitrarily high, for example choose 400V, and design the DCDC stage such that it can operate at full power with a bus voltage ranging from 200V to 400V.
So the minimum bus capacitance is Cout*(400^2-200^2)/2=20, so Cout = 330uF. The max energy stored is (400^2)/2*0.000333 = 26.6J.
Assuming the physical size of the capacitors are determined by energy density, option A will require 175% the capacitor volume of option B. In practice when looking at real components I would expect option B to have an even greater advantage. For example, option A could be done with 18 of
these in parallel, total volume is 190 cm^3. Option B would require one of
these, total volume is 33.6 cm^3.