Is the 555 really that much cheaper than a voltage mode
PWM (35xx series)? At least you'd have things like a voltage
reference and the ability to drive a power MOSFET decently.
Some versions have a 50% max duty, built in.
Why you "want" to use the 555, I don't know. There are so
many options out there that are all pretty cheap.
[Actually i tried to experiment to vary the duty cycle of 555 timer using the control pin, but i am not able to vary the duty cycle below 50%. Also when i keep the control voltage below 1V. I get a distorted wave shape at o/p.
Please suggest the reason for the same.
I have attached the schematic
555's can be made to work below 50%. A common way to do that is to insert diodes to separate the charge and discharging resistors. AN170 from Philips has a nice discussion of that, but appears not to be available any longer. Here is a portion of Figure 9 from that application note.
Since AN170 is not longer available, I will attach it here too.
John
Edit: Forgot to add that I agree with dick_freebird's analysis above (Post #4).
[Actually i tried to experiment to vary the duty cycle of 555 timer using the control pin, but i am not able to vary the duty cycle below 50%. Also when i keep the control voltage below 1V. I get a distorted wave shape at o/p.
Please suggest the reason for the same.
I have attached the schematic