cupoftea
Advanced Member level 6
Hi,
We have a 300W synch pushpull, 18-36vin, 32vout, 300wout, 300khz, 1:2
Cust wants us to fix it.
It has no snubbers on the fets. The pushpull is particularly victim to leakage inductance problems, as well as having to have snubbers to burn up the magnetising current energy, so as to reset that too. Unlike the full bridge and 2tranForwardwhich just lets magnetising current and leakage inductor current "ring out"....no related dissipation to speak of.
So why has the pushpull nto been banned yet?
People "Like" it due to low side drive......but its "fool's gold".
The sec FETs will see 144V off state voltage at 36vin....but then we must add the leakage inductance spike to that....so its more......the FETs are 200V rated , so we have to have TVS's which act within 145V-195V....not an easy pick.
Having to burn up the primary magnetising current is also a massive downer...dont know why pushpull even exists?
We have a 300W synch pushpull, 18-36vin, 32vout, 300wout, 300khz, 1:2
Cust wants us to fix it.
It has no snubbers on the fets. The pushpull is particularly victim to leakage inductance problems, as well as having to have snubbers to burn up the magnetising current energy, so as to reset that too. Unlike the full bridge and 2tranForwardwhich just lets magnetising current and leakage inductor current "ring out"....no related dissipation to speak of.
So why has the pushpull nto been banned yet?
People "Like" it due to low side drive......but its "fool's gold".
The sec FETs will see 144V off state voltage at 36vin....but then we must add the leakage inductance spike to that....so its more......the FETs are 200V rated , so we have to have TVS's which act within 145V-195V....not an easy pick.
Having to burn up the primary magnetising current is also a massive downer...dont know why pushpull even exists?