Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Electromigration in VLSI design

Status
Not open for further replies.

praveen1984

Newbie level 5
Newbie level 5
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
9
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,339
Hi,
I have a doubt regarding electromigration on nets in VLSI design.
In any SoC design, there are only three nets: the Power/Ground net, Signal net, and Clock net.
My question is which of the net is more prone to electromigration and why?

Please correct me if my question or net assumptions were wrong.

Thank You
 

You can't say one is more prone without considering the
construction and the burden.

However all things being equal except the application (i.e.
equal RMS current density), the supply net will be the worst
because its current is unidirectional (so no partial reversal
of material migration, per cycle, because no cycle).

Next worse would be the clock because while AC, it's highest
cycle rate. Logic is generally a don't-care. We would apply a
2X DC Jmax rule to periodic, reversing currents. For outputs
with signigicant pulsed load, unidirectional legs would be
criticized against the DC value for time averaged current
density, and a 10X DC limit to the pulse amplitude (these
were locally developed rules in a HiRel products organization;
unlikely you'd see the same exactly, but someone should have
published foundry*application-space EM groundrules for you.
 
You can't say one is more prone without considering the
construction and the burden.

However all things being equal except the application (i.e.
equal RMS current density), the supply net will be the worst
because its current is unidirectional (so no partial reversal
of material migration, per cycle, because no cycle).

Next worse would be the clock because while AC, it's highest
cycle rate. Logic is generally a don't-care. We would apply a
2X DC Jmax rule to periodic, reversing currents. For outputs
with signigicant pulsed load, unidirectional legs would be
criticized against the DC value for time averaged current
density, and a 10X DC limit to the pulse amplitude (these
were locally developed rules in a HiRel products organization;
unlikely you'd see the same exactly, but someone should have
published foundry*application-space EM groundrules for you.
Thank you Dick for the brief explanation.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top