Hawaslsh
Full Member level 3
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2015
- Messages
- 171
- Helped
- 5
- Reputation
- 10
- Reaction score
- 7
- Trophy points
- 1,298
- Location
- Washington DC, USA
- Activity points
- 3,527
Hello,
I had a question concerning the use of a balun and if it was possible to reverse the pinout suggested by its datasheet. I am planning on using a very nice, wideband mixer (LTC5552) and its IF output is differential. I already have a balun made by Macom (MABA-011082) I was thinking of using on the mixers IF output. The pinout for both devices is above. However, when I was looking at the possible layout for a PCB the suggested pinout from the balun crisscrosses the IF output from the mixer (left picture below). I realize I can rotate he part and route a line underneath the balun itself. But that wouldn't be the best transmission line geometry in my opinion and matching the phase exactly would be a bit harder (right picture below).
Sadly I think the asnswer is no, but I wanted to ask others if it was possible to "reverse" the suggested balun pinout and still maintain the same operation / performance (picture below). Instead of using the dots on the primary and secondary coil as the positive end, I was thinking of using the non-dot end as the positive, and ground the primary dot, Any thoughts?
Thanks in advance,
Sami
I had a question concerning the use of a balun and if it was possible to reverse the pinout suggested by its datasheet. I am planning on using a very nice, wideband mixer (LTC5552) and its IF output is differential. I already have a balun made by Macom (MABA-011082) I was thinking of using on the mixers IF output. The pinout for both devices is above. However, when I was looking at the possible layout for a PCB the suggested pinout from the balun crisscrosses the IF output from the mixer (left picture below). I realize I can rotate he part and route a line underneath the balun itself. But that wouldn't be the best transmission line geometry in my opinion and matching the phase exactly would be a bit harder (right picture below).
Sadly I think the asnswer is no, but I wanted to ask others if it was possible to "reverse" the suggested balun pinout and still maintain the same operation / performance (picture below). Instead of using the dots on the primary and secondary coil as the positive end, I was thinking of using the non-dot end as the positive, and ground the primary dot, Any thoughts?
Thanks in advance,
Sami